Japan Professional Engineer (技術士) Second-stage Exam — Agriculture division

Japan · Institution of Professional Engineers, Japan (IPEJ) · licensing

31practice questions written to this syllabus
2subjects

Format

Written (not multiple choice): compulsory paper 2 h (40 marks), elective papers 3.5 h (30 + 30 marks), then a 20-minute oral. 4–7 years' experience required.

Sections

Over the years

Options revised from 2019. There is no stand-alone farm-machinery option: Japan examines agricultural engineering as rural and irrigation civil engineering. Past papers are free to read but not openly licensed.

Official source: https://www.engineer.or.jp/c_topics/011/011422.html

Subjects this exam draws on

Crop Production & Protection for Engineers30 questionsIrrigation Engineering (Soil-Water-Plant, Conveyance, Surface Methods)1 questions

Five practice questions, worked

Original questions written to this exam's published syllabus and pattern. Not past papers.

1. A herbicide applied after sowing but before the crop and weeds emerge is described as:

  1. Post-emergence
  2. Directed post-emergence
  3. Pre-emergence
  4. Pre-plant incorporated
Answer and working

C. Pre-emergence

Pre-emergence herbicides are applied to the soil surface after sowing and before emergence. Post-emergence products go on emerged weeds; pre-plant incorporated products are mixed into soil before sowing; a directed spray is a post-emergence spray aimed below the crop canopy.

Crop Production & Protection for Engineers · Weed management

2. The head reaches of a canal command suffer waterlogging while tail-end farmers are short of water. Which strategy addresses both problems together?

  1. Converting the tail end to rice
  2. Conjunctive use: pumping groundwater in the head reaches while limiting canal allocations there, and routing more canal water to the tail
  3. Lining only the tail-end watercourses
  4. Increasing canal supplies to the head reaches
Answer and working

B. Conjunctive use: pumping groundwater in the head reaches while limiting canal allocations there, and routing more canal water to the tail

Pumping lowers water tables in the waterlogged head, and freeing canal water for the tail improves equity. More water to the head worsens both problems; lining at the tail helps the tail only; rice at the tail increases demand where water is scarce.

Irrigation Engineering (Soil-Water-Plant, Conveyance, Surface Methods) · Command area development

3. A farmer irrigates a prepared field, lets the first flush of weeds emerge, kills them with a shallow pass or a non-selective herbicide, and then sows. This practice is called:

  1. Soil solarisation
  2. Smother cropping
  3. A stale seedbed
  4. Allelopathic mulching
Answer and working

C. A stale seedbed

The stale seedbed technique depletes the surface weed seed bank before sowing. Solarisation heats moist soil under clear plastic; smother cropping uses a competitive crop to suppress weeds; allelopathic mulching relies on chemicals released by residue.

Crop Production & Protection for Engineers · Weed management

4. An insecticide label gives a dose of 1.0 kg a.i./ha. The product is a 50 % wettable powder. How much product is needed per hectare?

  1. 0.5 kg
  2. 50 kg
  3. 2.0 kg
  4. 1.0 kg
Answer and working

C. 2.0 kg

Product = a.i. dose ÷ fraction a.i. = 1.0 ÷ 0.50 = 2.0 kg. 0.5 kg multiplies by 0.5; 1.0 kg ignores the formulation; 50 kg treats the percentage as a multiplier.

Crop Production & Protection for Engineers · Pest and disease management and application rates

5. A sprayer calibrated at 6 km/h delivers 150 L/ha. The operator drives at 8 km/h without changing nozzles or pressure. What is the actual application rate, and what happens to the dose of a.i. if the tank mix was made for 150 L/ha?

  1. 112.5 L/ha, but the a.i. dose stays the same per hectare
  2. 150 L/ha, as the pump compensates for speed automatically
  3. 200 L/ha, and the a.i. dose rises by about 33 %
  4. 112.5 L/ha, and the a.i. dose falls by 25 %
Answer and working

D. 112.5 L/ha, and the a.i. dose falls by 25 %

Rate ∝ 1/speed at constant flow: 150 × 6 ÷ 8 = 112.5 L/ha. The tank concentration is fixed, so a.i. per hectare also falls to 75 % of target. 200 L/ha inverts the speed ratio; a fixed-pressure sprayer without rate control does not compensate; and with a fixed concentration, a.i. dose falls in step with volume.

Crop Production & Protection for Engineers · Pest and disease management and application rates

Practise it, and prove it

These notes are free to read here, with no account.

What the Laisha app adds:

Free for ten days, then a subscription. We would rather write that here than have you find it later.

Open Laisha →