Forestry & Forest Sciences · Forest Protection, Wildlife & Rangelands · also Wildlife Management, Protected Area Management, Wildlife Conservation and Ecotourism
Managing wildlife populations, habitats and protected areas, resolving human-wildlife conflict, enforcing wildlife law and running ecotourism. Animal health, capture drugs and wildlife disease are covered in the Veterinary track (wildlife-zoo-medicine).
In the exams: ICAR AICE-JRF 59 Unit 10 (man-animal conflict) and Unit 11 (ecotourism); IFoS Forestry Paper II Section B (wildlife and legislation); ICAR AIEEA-PG Group 09 (wildlife management)
Wildlife management is the application of ecological knowledge to wildlife populations and their habitats, and to the people who interact with them, to meet human goals. In India those goals are mainly conservation: keeping viable populations of tigers, elephants, rhinos, birds and many lesser-known species in a densely populated country, while reducing the costs wildlife imposes on rural people. Most of this work happens in and around protected areas, which are managed largely by forest departments.
This subject covers the principles of wildlife management; habitat management and manipulation; protected area categories and networks; protected area planning and management plans; corridors and landscape connectivity; human-wildlife conflict and its mitigation; wildlife crime, trade and enforcement; captive breeding and reintroduction; ecotourism; wildlife law; and endangered species recovery programmes. It builds on wildlife-biology-ecology, which covers the animals, their habitats, behaviour, population dynamics and census methods. Ecological principles such as succession and disturbance are covered in forest-ecology, and the full text of forest and wildlife law, CITES and other international instruments in forest-policy-law-governance; this manual refers to them and focuses on how they are applied in management. Capture drugs, wildlife health and disease are covered in the Veterinary track.
The manual is written for students preparing for the ICAR AICE-JRF forestry paper (human-animal conflict and ecotourism units), the Indian Forest Service and state forest service examinations, and the ICAR AIEEA-PG forestry paper, and for protected area managers, range officers and conservation professionals. Numbers of protected areas, tiger reserves and Ramsar sites grow every year, so approximate values are given and current official lists should be consulted.
Aldo Leopold, often called the father of wildlife management, defined game management in 1933 as the art of making land produce sustained annual crops of wild game for recreational use. Modern wildlife management has a broader scope: it aims to conserve biodiversity, maintain ecological processes, provide benefits such as tourism and ecosystem services, and reduce conflicts. Graeme Caughley distinguished three broad goals of management for any population: to increase it (when it is rare or declining), to harvest it sustainably, to reduce it (when it is overabundant or a pest), or to leave it alone and monitor it. Which goal applies depends on the species, its status and human values.
In India, wildlife management evolved from colonial game reserves, where hunting was regulated for the elite, to the conservation era that began with the Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972 and Project Tiger in 1973. Sport hunting is banned, and management focuses on protection, habitat management, and increasingly on landscapes and people.
Several principles guide modern practice. Management should be based on clearly stated objectives and on the best available science, including monitoring data. Populations should be managed together with their habitats, since habitat is usually the main limiting factor. Management operates at several scales, from individual protected areas to landscapes and regions, because many species range beyond protected boundaries. People are part of the system: the success of management depends on local communities, whose rights, livelihoods and attitudes must be considered. The precautionary principle applies when the consequences of actions are uncertain and potentially severe.
Adaptive management, developed by Holling and Walters in the 1970s and 1980s, treats management actions as experiments: managers state their assumptions, implement actions, monitor results and adjust. Active adaptive management deliberately compares alternative actions to learn faster; passive adaptive management uses the best current model and updates it as data accumulate. This approach suits wildlife management, where knowledge is incomplete and systems change.
Management can focus on species, habitats or ecosystems. Species-focused management targets particular populations, such as tigers or great Indian bustards, often using flagship species that attract public support or umbrella species whose protection also protects many others. Habitat-focused management manipulates vegetation, water and other resources. Ecosystem-based management aims to maintain the structure, function and processes of entire ecosystems. In practice, the three are combined. Tiger reserves, for example, use the tiger as a flagship and umbrella species while managing whole forest ecosystems.
Habitat management manipulates vegetation, water and other resources to benefit target species. Controlled or prescribed burning of grasslands, as practised in Kaziranga, Manas, Dudhwa and the meadows of central Indian tiger reserves, removes dead grass, stimulates nutritious regrowth for herbivores and prevents woody encroachment; burning must be planned in patches and timed to avoid harming nesting birds and small animals and to limit uncontrolled fire, a topic covered further in forest-fire-science. Meadow development and maintenance, by removing woody growth or allowing former village sites to revert to grassland after voluntary relocation, has increased ungulate and tiger densities in reserves such as Kanha. Grazing management controls livestock grazing that competes with wild herbivores, spreads disease and degrades habitat.
Control of invasive plants is a major task. Lantana camara has invaded a large share of India's forests and reduces forage for herbivores; other important invaders include Prosopis juliflora in arid and coastal areas, Chromolaena odorata, Mikania micrantha, Parthenium hysterophorus and Senna tora. Methods include manual uprooting (such as the cut-root-stock method for lantana), cutting and burning, and restoration with native grasses; follow-up is essential because invasives regrow from seeds and roots.
In dry habitats and seasons, water often limits animal distribution. Managers develop water sources such as check dams, water holes, ponds and solar-pumped troughs. Artificial waterholes can increase carrying capacity but can also concentrate animals, degrade vegetation around them, favour water-dependent species over drought-adapted ones, and increase disease transmission and poaching risk, so their number and placement should be planned carefully. Wetland management maintains water levels, removes invasive aquatic weeds such as water hyacinth, and manages grazing for waterbirds, as at Keoladeo National Park, where water supply from outside the park is a recurring issue.
Other measures include salt licks to supply minerals, nest boxes and retention of snags for cavity nesters, artificial nesting platforms, protection of breeding and denning sites from disturbance, and soil and moisture conservation works. Supplementary feeding is generally avoided because it can create dependence, spread disease and concentrate animals.
Habitat interventions should follow from the management plan's objectives and habitat evaluation, should be monitored, and should consider unintended effects on non-target species. Interventions that favour one species may harm others: creating open meadows for ungulates reduces habitat for forest-interior species, and waterholes that help elephants may harm vegetation. An adaptive approach, with monitoring of vegetation and animal responses, helps managers learn which interventions work.
IUCN defines a protected area as a clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. IUCN's management categories classify protected areas by their primary management objective: Category Ia, strict nature reserve, protected mainly for biodiversity and possibly geological features, with human visitation strictly controlled; Category Ib, wilderness area, large unmodified areas retaining their natural character; Category II, national park, large natural areas protecting ecological processes and providing for compatible visitor use; Category III, natural monument or feature; Category IV, habitat or species management area, which may need active management of habitat; Category V, protected landscape or seascape, where people and nature have interacted to produce distinct character; and Category VI, protected area with sustainable use of natural resources. Categories describe management objectives, not effectiveness, and the same name, such as 'national park', may correspond to different categories in different countries. Other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) are areas outside protected areas that deliver long-term conservation.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (2022) Target 3, often called '30 by 30', calls for at least 30 percent of land and of sea to be effectively conserved through protected areas and OECMs by 2030, while respecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities.
Under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, India has four categories of protected area: national parks, wildlife sanctuaries, conservation reserves and community reserves (the last two added in 2002). National parks have the strictest protection, with no rights permitted, while sanctuaries may allow certain rights. India's network includes over 1,000 protected areas covering roughly 5 percent of the country's geographical area, with over a hundred national parks and several hundred sanctuaries. Rodgers and Panwar's biogeographic planning of the network aimed to represent all biogeographic zones and provinces.
Overlapping designations add layers. Tiger reserves, numbering more than 50, are notified under the Act's tiger chapter and include a core or critical tiger habitat and a buffer zone. Elephant reserves under Project Elephant are administrative units covering elephant landscapes. Biosphere reserves, under UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere programme begun in 1971, have a core area, a buffer zone and a transition area; India has 18 biosphere reserves, of which a majority are in the UNESCO world network. Ramsar sites, wetlands of international importance under the Ramsar Convention, number more than 80 in India. Natural World Heritage Sites, such as Kaziranga, Manas, Keoladeo, the Sundarbans, the Western Ghats and the Great Himalayan National Park, are recognised under the World Heritage Convention.
Eco-sensitive zones (ESZs) around protected areas are notified under the Environment (Protection) Act to regulate activities such as mining and polluting industries in the surrounding landscape. Following Supreme Court directions, a default zone of up to 10 km has applied where specific zones have not been notified, with site-specific widths in notified zones. ESZs act as buffers between protected areas and more intensively used land.
Every protected area in India is expected to be managed under an approved management plan, usually for ten years. The Wildlife Institute of India's guide to planning wildlife management in protected areas and managed landscapes, prepared by V. B. Sawarkar and colleagues, sets out the standard format. A plan typically has two parts. Part I describes the protected area and evaluates its state: location, boundaries, legal status, geology, soils, climate, vegetation, fauna, history of management, human use and pressures, and an evaluation of past management. Part II sets out the proposed management: a vision, objectives, problems, zonation, strategies and actions for each zone and theme, monitoring and research, budgets and a schedule.
Zonation divides the area into units with different management rules. Common zones are the core or inviolate zone, where human use is excluded or minimal; restoration zones; tourism zones, where visitor use is permitted under rules; and the buffer or ecodevelopment zone around the protected area, where the aim is to reduce dependence of local communities on the protected area and to enlist their support. Tiger reserves must also have a Tiger Conservation Plan, required under the tiger chapter of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, which covers both core and buffer.
Ecodevelopment, promoted in India through the India Ecodevelopment Project in seven protected areas from the mid-1990s, aims to reduce local people's dependence on protected area resources by providing alternative fuel, fodder, income and infrastructure through village ecodevelopment committees, in return for support for conservation. Results were mixed but some, such as Periyar Tiger Reserve, where former poachers and forest produce collectors became guides and protectors through ecodevelopment committees, became widely cited examples. Participatory planning, involving local communities, panchayats and other stakeholders, is now expected in management planning, along with recognition of rights under the Forest Rights Act (discussed in forest-policy-law-governance).
Management effectiveness evaluation (MEE) assesses how well a protected area is managed. The IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas framework, developed by Hockings and colleagues, evaluates six elements: context (values and threats), planning, inputs (resources), process (management practices), outputs (actions completed) and outcomes (conservation results). India's tiger reserves have been evaluated every four years since 2006 by the National Tiger Conservation Authority and the Wildlife Institute of India, with scores and ratings from poor to excellent, and MEE has been extended to other protected areas. Such evaluations help identify weaknesses and allocate resources, but scores are based partly on expert judgement and must be interpreted with care.
Most protected areas are too small to hold viable populations of wide-ranging species such as tigers and elephants on their own. Island biogeography theory (MacArthur and Wilson, 1967) predicts that smaller and more isolated habitat islands hold fewer species, and the debate over whether a single large or several small reserves (SLOSS) conserve more species led to the recognition that connectivity between reserves matters. In metapopulation theory, developed by Levins in 1969, a species persists as a set of local populations linked by dispersal, with local extinctions balanced by recolonisation; if patches are isolated, recolonisation fails and the metapopulation declines. Connectivity also allows gene flow, which prevents inbreeding, and movement in response to seasonal resources and climate change.
Corridors are strips or networks of habitat that connect larger patches. Types include linear corridors, such as riparian strips and forest belts; stepping stones, patches close enough for animals to move between them; and landscape corridors, broad areas of mixed land use, including farmland and plantations, through which animals move. Many large mammals, especially elephants and tigers, move through human-modified landscapes, so maintaining permeability of the whole landscape, not only narrow corridors, is important. India's elephant corridors have been mapped by the government and non-governmental organisations, which have identified well over a hundred corridors linking elephant habitats, many of them threatened by roads, railways, canals, mining and settlement. Tiger corridors linking reserves in central India, the Western Ghats and the Terai have been identified using telemetry, genetics and modelling.
Corridor design uses data on animal movement from telemetry and genetics, and models of landscape resistance. Least-cost path analysis finds the route of lowest cumulative resistance between patches; circuit theory, applied with tools such as Circuitscape (McRae and colleagues), treats the landscape as an electrical circuit and identifies pinch points and multiple pathways. Corridor width should reflect the species, the habitat quality inside the corridor and the surrounding land use.
Linear infrastructure is a major threat. Mitigation measures include underpasses and overpasses, viaducts, fencing to guide animals to crossings, speed limits, and alignment changes. A notable Indian example is the series of animal underpasses on National Highway 44 between the Pench and Kanha tiger reserves, which camera traps have shown being used by tigers and many other species. Railway lines through elephant habitats have caused many elephant deaths; measures include speed restrictions, clearing vegetation for visibility, warning systems and coordination between railway and forest staff. Legal protection of corridors can come through notification as conservation reserves or eco-sensitive zones, land purchase, and land-use planning.
Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) refers to interactions in which wildlife harms people's lives, property or livelihoods, or people harm wildlife in response. In India it includes crop raiding by elephants, wild pigs, nilgai, deer and primates; livestock predation by tigers, leopards, wolves and snow leopards; human injuries and deaths, notably from elephants, tigers, leopards, bears and snakes; and damage to houses and stored grain. Elephants alone are responsible for several hundred human deaths a year in India, and many elephants die in retaliation, by electrocution, poisoning or on railway lines.
Causes include loss and fragmentation of habitat, which pushes animals into farmland; expansion of farming and settlement into wildlife habitat; availability of attractive crops and livestock near forests; recovery of wildlife populations in some areas; changes in animal behaviour, such as habituation and learned crop raiding; and degradation of habitat by invasive plants and overgrazing. Conflict is also shaped by social factors: people's tolerance depends on their dependence on agriculture, the compensation they receive and their trust in the forest department.
Mitigation methods fall into several groups. Barriers include electric fences (solar-powered), trenches, stone walls and, for elephants, hanging fences; they work best when well designed and maintained, and badly sited fences can shift conflict to neighbours. Deterrents include guarding, watch towers, noise, lights, chilli-based smoke and ropes, and beehive fences, developed in Kenya by Lucy King and tried in India, which exploit elephants' avoidance of bees. Early warning systems use community trackers, SMS alerts, camera traps and thermal sensors to warn villages of approaching elephants. Livestock husbandry improvements, such as predator-proof corrals at night, guarding dogs and herding, reduce depredation. Crop choice, such as growing crops unpalatable to elephants near forest edges, can help.
Removal of problem animals, by capture and translocation or, as a last resort, killing, is sometimes necessary. Section 11 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act allows the Chief Wildlife Warden to permit hunting or capture of an animal that has become dangerous to human life. Translocation often fails: translocated leopards, for example, have been shown to return or to cause conflict at the release site. Compensation and ex-gratia payments for crop and livestock losses, injury and death reduce retaliation, but are effective only if prompt, fair and simple to claim; insurance schemes are an alternative. Rapid response teams and community volunteers trained to manage conflict situations are increasingly used. National guidelines on managing human-wildlife conflict have been issued to states, encouraging prevention, rapid response and fair compensation.
Effective conflict management combines landscape-level planning to keep habitats and corridors intact, site-specific prevention, rapid response to incidents, fair compensation and community engagement. Coexistence, in which people and wildlife share landscapes with acceptable levels of risk, is the long-term goal, and is supported by cultural traditions of tolerance in many parts of India.
Illegal wildlife trade is one of the largest illegal trades in the world and a major threat to many species. Products include tiger skins and bones, leopard skins, rhino horn, elephant ivory, pangolin scales and meat, bear bile, shahtoosh wool from the Tibetan antelope, musk from musk deer, live birds, turtles and tortoises such as the Indian star tortoise, reptile skins, marine species such as sea cucumbers and seahorses, and plants and timber such as red sanders (Pterocarpus santalinus). Pangolins are often described as among the most trafficked mammals in the world. Demand comes from traditional medicine, luxury goods, the pet trade and food, often in other countries, and trade is organised by networks linked to other forms of crime.
The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), signed in 1973 and in force from 1975, regulates international trade in listed species through a permit system: Appendix I species, threatened with extinction, may not be traded commercially; Appendix II species may be traded with export permits based on legality and non-detriment findings; and Appendix III species are listed by individual countries seeking cooperation. India joined CITES in 1976 and implements it through the Wildlife (Protection) Act, whose Schedule IV, since the 2022 amendment, lists CITES specimens. The convention's details are covered in forest-policy-law-governance.
Other actors include TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network founded in 1976; INTERPOL and the World Customs Organization; the International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime; and regional enforcement networks such as the South Asia Wildlife Enforcement Network.
India's Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (WCCB), provided for by the 2006 amendment of the Wildlife (Protection) Act and set up in 2007, collects intelligence on organised wildlife crime, coordinates enforcement among agencies, assists customs in inspecting consignments and builds capacity. Within protected areas, forest staff conduct patrols from anti-poaching camps, and patrol monitoring systems record patrol effort and observations; M-STrIPES (Monitoring System for Tigers: Intensive Protection and Ecological Status) is used in tiger reserves, and SMART (Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool) is used in many countries. Intelligence-led enforcement, informant networks, cooperation with police and customs, and community involvement complement patrols.
Wildlife forensics supports prosecution: laboratories at the Wildlife Institute of India and other institutions identify species from parts and products through morphology and DNA, and link seized items to individuals or populations. Strong cases need proper evidence collection, chain of custody and trained prosecutors; conviction rates for wildlife crimes have often been low, which reduces deterrence. Offences involving species in the highest schedule attract the most severe penalties under the Act.
Captive or conservation breeding maintains populations of threatened species in captivity as insurance against extinction and as a source for reintroduction. It is most justified when wild populations are very small or face threats that cannot be controlled quickly. In India, the Central Zoo Authority, established in 1992 under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, regulates zoos and coordinates conservation breeding programmes for selected endangered species, with designated coordinating and participating zoos. Examples include the vulture conservation breeding centres begun at Pinjore in Haryana in the early 2000s after the diclofenac crisis; the gharial breeding and head-starting programme under Project Crocodile, begun in 1975, in which eggs are collected, hatched and young reared until large enough to escape most predators before release; the pygmy hog breeding programme in Assam; the great Indian bustard breeding centre in Rajasthan; and breeding of red panda, snow leopard and several pheasants.
Genetic and demographic management is essential. Studbooks record pedigrees; breeding pairs are chosen to minimise mean kinship and retain genetic diversity; and the number of founders, ideally from wild populations representing genetic variation, limits the diversity that can be retained. Captive populations can adapt to captivity, losing behaviours such as predator avoidance and foraging, so programmes aim for short periods in captivity and enrichment that maintains natural behaviour.
IUCN's 2013 guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations distinguish population restoration, which includes reinforcement (adding individuals to an existing population) and reintroduction (re-establishing a population within the species' indigenous range where it has disappeared), from conservation introductions, which include assisted colonisation (moving a species outside its indigenous range to avoid extinction) and ecological replacement (introducing a species to perform an ecological function lost through extinction). The guidelines require feasibility assessment, removal of the original causes of decline, risk assessment including disease and invasiveness, monitoring and an exit strategy.
India's examples include the reintroduction of tigers to Sariska from 2008 and to Panna from 2009, after both reserves lost their tigers to poaching; Panna's tiger population recovered strongly. Rhinos were translocated to Manas under Indian Rhino Vision 2020 after the park lost its rhinos during civil unrest. Barasingha have been reintroduced from Kanha to other central Indian sites. Project Cheetah introduced cheetahs from Namibia and South Africa to Kuno National Park from 2022; it has been debated as a case of introducing an African subspecies to replace the extinct Asiatic cheetah, with early challenges including mortality. Soft release, holding animals in enclosures at the release site before release, often improves settling compared with hard release.
Successful reintroductions usually involve removing the cause of decline, adequate habitat and prey, enough founders, wild-caught rather than captive-bred animals where possible, soft release, long-term monitoring and community support. Many reintroductions fail, and the costs are high, so habitat protection of wild populations remains the first priority.
Ecotourism is defined by The International Ecotourism Society as responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the well-being of local people, and involves interpretation and education. Principles include minimising physical, social and behavioural impacts; building environmental and cultural awareness; providing positive experiences for visitors and hosts; providing direct financial benefits for conservation; generating benefits for local people; and respecting local culture. In India, tiger reserves and other protected areas attract large numbers of visitors, providing revenue, employment and public support, but also creating crowding at sightings, disturbance, waste, pressure on infrastructure around park gates and inequitable sharing of benefits.
Tourism carrying capacity is the maximum use an area can sustain without unacceptable impacts. Cifuentes' method, widely used in Latin America and adapted elsewhere, calculates three levels. Physical carrying capacity (PCC) is the maximum number of visits possible given the area and time: PCC = A x (V/a) x Rf, where A is the available area (for example, trail length), V/a the visitors per unit of area, and Rf the rotation factor (opening hours divided by average visit length). For a 1,000 m trail where each visitor needs 1 m, open 8 hours with 2-hour visits, PCC = 1,000 x 1 x 4 = 4,000 visits per day. Real carrying capacity (RCC) applies correction factors for limiting conditions such as rainfall, erosion or wildlife breeding: with correction factors of 0.2 and 0.1, RCC = 4,000 x 0.8 x 0.9 = 2,880. Effective carrying capacity (ECC) multiplies RCC by management capacity, the proportion of needed staff and facilities available: at 60 percent, ECC = 1,728 visits per day.
Because carrying capacity numbers can give a false sense of precision, frameworks such as Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC), developed by Stankey and colleagues for the US Forest Service in 1985, focus on defining acceptable conditions, monitoring indicators and taking management action when standards are exceeded. Visitor management tools include zoning, permits and quotas, limits on vehicle numbers and routes, guided-only access, timing restrictions, fees, and interpretation. In India, guidelines of the National Tiger Conservation Authority after 2012 restricted tourism in core areas of tiger reserves to a limited share of the core (commonly cited as no more than 20 percent), required tourism plans, and levied conservation fees on tourism facilities to support local communities.
Ecotourism can support conservation only if local people benefit. Approaches include employing local people as guides, drivers and staff; community-owned homestays and lodges; purchasing local products; revenue sharing through ecodevelopment committees; and community-run ecotourism in areas outside protected areas. Periyar Tiger Reserve's ecodevelopment committees, which run treks and other programmes employing former poachers and forest produce collectors, are a frequently cited example. Leakage, the share of tourism spending that leaves the local area to outside operators, can be high, and careful design is needed to ensure that benefits reach those who bear the costs of living with wildlife.
The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 is India's main wildlife law; its provisions on protected areas, schedules and institutions are described in detail in forest-policy-law-governance. For managers, its key features are as follows. Hunting of wild animals specified in the schedules is prohibited (Section 9), except as permitted, for example under Section 11 for animals dangerous to human life, or under Section 12 for education, research, scientific management or collection for zoos. The 2022 amendment rationalised the schedules into four: Schedule I for animals with the highest protection, Schedule II for animals with lesser protection, Schedule III for protected plants, and Schedule IV for specimens listed under CITES. Protected areas are declared under the Act as sanctuaries, national parks, conservation reserves and community reserves, with procedures for settlement of rights in sanctuaries and national parks. The Act establishes the National Board for Wildlife, chaired by the Prime Minister, and state boards; the Central Zoo Authority (added in 1991); the National Tiger Conservation Authority and tiger reserves (2006); and the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau (2006). It regulates trade in wildlife and its products, and provides for offences, penalties, seizure and prosecution, with the most severe penalties for offences involving Schedule I species and protected areas.
Other national laws relevant to wildlife management include the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (forest land and diversion); the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (eco-sensitive zones, environmental clearances); the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 (access to biological resources and benefit sharing, biodiversity heritage sites); the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, which recognises community and individual rights in forests including protected areas and provides for critical wildlife habitats; the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960; and the Customs Act for trade enforcement. Interpretation of these laws by the Supreme Court and High Courts, especially in the long-running forest case (T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad) and in cases on tiger reserves and eco-sensitive zones, has shaped wildlife management.
India is party to the main international wildlife and biodiversity instruments: CITES; the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS, the Bonn Convention, 1979), under which India hosted the thirteenth conference of parties at Gandhinagar in 2020; the Ramsar Convention on wetlands (1971); the World Heritage Convention (1972); the Convention on Biological Diversity (1992); and the International Whaling Commission. These are described in forest-policy-law-governance. Implementing them depends on national laws and institutions such as those above.
India has run species-focused programmes since the 1970s. Project Tiger, launched in 1973 with nine tiger reserves, became the National Tiger Conservation Authority in 2006; tiger numbers estimated by the national method rose from about 1,411 in 2006 to 1,706 in 2010, 2,226 in 2014, 2,967 in 2018 and about 3,682 in 2022. Between 2018 and 2022 this was an increase of about 24 percent, or about 5.5 percent per year. Project Crocodile (1975) brought gharial and mugger back from very low numbers through captive rearing and sanctuaries, although the gharial remains critically endangered. Project Elephant (1992) supports elephant conservation, corridors and conflict management through elephant reserves. Project Snow Leopard (2009) promotes landscape-level conservation in the high Himalaya with community participation. Vulture conservation, under action plans since 2006 and the Vulture Action Plan 2020-2025, combines the ban on veterinary diclofenac and other toxic drugs, conservation breeding and vulture-safe zones. Recovery of the great Indian bustard involves protecting grasslands, conservation breeding and burying or marking power lines, the subject of Supreme Court orders. Project Cheetah (2022) and Project Dolphin (announced in 2020) are more recent.
The Asiatic lion recovered from very low numbers early in the twentieth century to several hundred in the Gir landscape through protection by the former rulers of Junagadh and later the state, with lions now spreading beyond the protected area; concerns about a single population led to proposals to establish a second population elsewhere. The greater one-horned rhinoceros recovered in Kaziranga to well over 2,000 animals through strict protection.
A recovery plan typically sets out the species' status and threats, recovery goals with measurable criteria for success, actions to address threats (habitat protection, anti-poaching, reducing specific causes of mortality, captive breeding, reintroduction), responsibilities, costs and timelines, and a monitoring plan. In the United States, the Endangered Species Act of 1973 requires recovery plans for listed species, and recoveries such as that of the bald eagle, delisted in 2007 after the DDT ban and habitat protection, are often cited. The California condor programme captured the last wild birds in 1987 for captive breeding and later released their descendants. Internationally, IUCN's Species Survival Commission coordinates species action planning.
Experience shows that recovery is most successful when the main threat is clearly identified and can be removed, as with DDT for raptors, diclofenac for vultures or hunting for many large mammals; when enough habitat remains; when political support and funding are sustained; and when local people benefit or at least are not harmed. Recovery is slow for long-lived species, and success can be reversed if threats return, as Sariska's loss of tigers to poaching in the early 2000s showed. Monitoring with robust methods, covered in wildlife-biology-ecology, is essential to know whether programmes are working.
Learn the IUCN categories, India's protected area types and overlays, the structure of a management plan and MEE framework, corridor concepts, the main conflict mitigation methods, CITES appendices and India's enforcement institutions, IUCN translocation types, ecotourism carrying capacity calculations, the WPA schedules and key sections, and the history and numbers of India's species programmes.
As a range officer or assistant conservator, you implement management plans, run anti-poaching patrols and patrol monitoring, manage burning, water and invasive control, respond to conflict incidents, process compensation claims, manage tourism zones and work with ecodevelopment committees. Judgement is needed to balance protection with local needs, to respond quickly and fairly to conflict, and to document offences properly for prosecution.
At senior level you write and approve management plans, plan landscapes and corridors, negotiate with infrastructure agencies over mitigation, set tourism policy, lead recovery programmes and represent wildlife interests in land-use decisions. Decisions include zonation, relocation and rights, translocation and reintroduction, and allocation of funds among competing needs.
Research questions include effectiveness of protected areas and enforcement, connectivity and corridor design with movement and genetic data, drivers and mitigation of human-wildlife conflict, outcomes of reintroductions, ecotourism impacts and benefit sharing, and evaluation of recovery programmes. Rigorous work combines ecological monitoring, social science and policy analysis.
Numbers of protected areas, tiger reserves, biosphere reserves, Ramsar sites and corridors change frequently; approximate figures are given and current official lists should be checked. Penalties under the Wildlife (Protection) Act changed with the 2022 amendment and are not tabulated here. Population figures for species are from recent national estimates and are approximate. Animal capture, immobilisation, health and disease are in the Veterinary track; detailed law and international conventions in forest-policy-law-governance; fire management in forest-fire-science; and survey methods in wildlife-biology-ecology. Outcomes of recent programmes such as Project Cheetah are still emerging and are described cautiously.
Original practice questions written to the syllabus and pattern of the exams named in each question's examTags. They are not past papers and do not reproduce any board's questions.
These notes are free to read here, with no account.
What the Laisha app adds:
Free for ten days, then a subscription. We would rather write that here than have you find it later.