LAISHA
Open Laisha

CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate Climate Finance, Climate Risk & Sustainable Investment: practice questions

CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate (formerly Certificate in ESG Investing) · International · CFA Institute

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
32written to this exam in this subject
7syllabus units

What this subject covers

Money for climate and sustainability and the risks climate poses to money: public climate finance, green bonds, taxonomies, physical and transition risk, scenario analysis, and ESG integration in agricultural lending and investment. Agricultural finance and credit are in the Agribusiness track; this subject is the climate and sustainability layer.

In the exams: GARP SCR (whole exam); CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate; UPSC CSE GS-III (climate finance)

What CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate asks from it

CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate

ESG factors and materiality, integration versus screening, thematic and impact investing, stewardship and engagement, ESG ratings and their divergence, green bonds and labelled products, SFDR and other disclosure regimes, and greenwashing risk.

Where the 32 questions fall

How our questions for CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate spread across the units of Climate Finance, Climate Risk & Sustainable Investment. Difficulty: 8 easy, 14 medium, 10 hard.

Green, social, sustainability and sustainability-linked bonds9
ESG integration, screening and stewardship9
Climate scenario analysis for portfolios5
Physical and transition risk4
Climate risk measurement and stress testing3
Nature-related financial risk1
Transition plans and their credibility1

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Green, social, sustainability and sustainability-linked bonds · easy

A USD 500 million sustainability-linked bond has a 5.00 per cent coupon and a 25 basis point step-up if its emissions target is missed. If the target is missed, how much extra interest does the issuer pay each year?

  1. USD 25.00 million
  2. USD 1.25 million
  3. USD 12.50 million
  4. USD 0.125 million
Answer and working

B. USD 1.25 million

Extra interest = 500 × 0.0025 = USD 1.25 million; the coupon becomes 5.25%. 12.50 treats 25 bp as 2.5%; 0.125 slips a factor of ten; 25.00 confuses basis points with millions.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

2 · Green, social, sustainability and sustainability-linked bonds · medium

What does the European Green Bond Standard require that the voluntary ICMA principles do not?

  1. Issuance only by EU member state governments, never by companies
  2. A guarantee from the European Central Bank on every bond issued
  3. A minimum coupon step-up of 100 basis points if targets are missed
  4. Taxonomy-aligned proceeds plus a registered external reviewer
Answer and working

D. Taxonomy-aligned proceeds plus a registered external reviewer

The EU GBS (regulation 2023, applying from December 2024) requires Taxonomy-aligned use of proceeds and external review by ESMA-registered reviewers. It has no step-up, is open to corporates, and carries no ECB guarantee.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

3 · Green, social, sustainability and sustainability-linked bonds · hard

Which is a common criticism of sustainability-linked bonds?

  1. They must be certified by the IPCC, which makes issuance slow and costly
  2. They restrict proceeds so tightly that issuers cannot fund general operations
  3. They cannot include any environmental KPIs, only social ones
  4. Step-ups tend to be small, targets weak and penalties late
Answer and working

D. Step-ups tend to be small, targets weak and penalties late

Critics note weak or nearly met targets, small step-ups relative to abatement costs, late observation dates and call options. Proceeds are unrestricted, no IPCC certification exists, and environmental KPIs are common.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

4 · Green, social, sustainability and sustainability-linked bonds · easy

Which institution issued the first Climate Awareness Bond in 2007, widely regarded as the first green bond?

  1. The World Bank
  2. The Asian Development Bank
  3. The Green Climate Fund
  4. The European Investment Bank
Answer and working

D. The European Investment Bank

The EIB issued the Climate Awareness Bond in 2007; the World Bank issued its first green bond in 2008. The GCF did not exist until 2010.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

5 · Climate risk measurement and stress testing · hard

Why should implied temperature rise (ITR) results be interpreted cautiously?

  1. ITR measures only physical risk and ignores corporate emission targets
  2. ITR is defined by the IPCC and is identical across all providers
  3. ITR applies only to sovereign bonds and cannot be computed for companies
  4. Results vary widely between providers because methods and assumptions differ
Answer and working

D. Results vary widely between providers because methods and assumptions differ

ITR depends on choices about scopes, targets, budgets and pathways, so providers' results for the same company can differ substantially. It is not IPCC-defined, relates to emissions trajectories, and is computed for companies.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

6 · Climate scenario analysis for portfolios · medium

Why do many climate scenario sets understate physical risk to portfolios?

  1. Damage functions omit extremes, tipping points and indirect effects
  2. They assume warming stops entirely after 2030 in every scenario
  3. They model only Europe, ignoring physical risk elsewhere
  4. They include too many extreme events, double-counting physical losses
Answer and working

A. Damage functions omit extremes, tipping points and indirect effects

Aggregate damage functions often miss extremes, tipping points and cascading impacts; NGFS revised damages upward in later vintages. Warming does not stop in 2030, extremes are under- not over-counted, and coverage is global.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

7 · ESG integration, screening and stewardship · medium

How does ESG integration differ from exclusionary screening?

  1. It weighs material ESG factors in valuation rather than excluding by rule
  2. It ignores financial returns and focuses purely on social outcomes
  3. It excludes every company with any ESG controversy, however small or old
  4. It invests only in companies with the highest ESG rating in the market
Answer and working

A. It weighs material ESG factors in valuation rather than excluding by rule

Integration systematically considers financially material ESG factors in analysis; it does not exclude by rule, chase top ratings or ignore returns.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

8 · ESG integration, screening and stewardship · hard

What is the main argument for engagement over divestment?

  1. Engagement guarantees higher returns than any divestment strategy over all periods
  2. Divestment is illegal for pension funds in all jurisdictions under fiduciary law
  3. Owners keep influence, while sellers pass shares to less concerned owners
  4. Divestment immediately reduces the company's emissions to zero
Answer and working

C. Owners keep influence, while sellers pass shares to less concerned owners

Engagement keeps voting and dialogue rights; divestment may have limited effect on companies' cost of capital or behaviour. Divestment is legal, engagement offers no guaranteed returns, and selling shares does not cut emissions.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

9 · ESG integration, screening and stewardship · medium

Which stewardship tool involves voting on shareholder resolutions and director elections?

  1. Best-in-class selection
  2. Proxy voting
  3. Thematic investing
  4. Negative screening
Answer and working

B. Proxy voting

Proxy voting exercises shareholder rights at company meetings. Screening, thematic investing and best-in-class are portfolio construction approaches.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

10 · Transition plans and their credibility · medium

Which is a strong test of a transition plan's credibility?

  1. Whether the plan covers only scope 1 emissions from head-office buildings
  2. Whether capital expenditure plans are consistent with the stated emission targets
  3. Whether the plan relies mainly on offsets bought in the year of reporting
  4. Whether the company has announced a net-zero pledge in a press release
Answer and working

B. Whether capital expenditure plans are consistent with the stated emission targets

Capex alignment shows whether resources match words. A pledge alone, offset reliance or narrow scope coverage weaken credibility.

Further reading: See the manual sources: UNFCCC decisions, ICMA principles, EU Taxonomy, PCAF, NGFS, TNFD, SBTi and the documents named in the explanation

Ten here, 32 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Climate Finance, Climate Risk & Sustainable InvestmentThe full study manual, free CFA Institute Sustainable Investing CertificateFormat, sections and how it has changed

More CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate practice

Sustainability Reporting & ESG Disclosure

Climate Finance, Climate Risk & Sustainable Investment for other exams

GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate · International

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.