LAISHA
Open Laisha

EPSO Administrator competitions Climate Adaptation, Climate-Smart Agriculture & Disaster Risk: practice questions

EPSO Administrator (AD) competitions — environment and climate profiles · European Union · European Personnel Selection Office

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
6worked here, free
22written to this exam in this subject
11syllabus units

What this subject covers

Reducing the harm climate does: vulnerability assessment, climate-smart agriculture, early warning, contingency plans, insurance and national adaptation planning. Index insurance as a financial product is in the Agribusiness track; here it is one adaptation tool among many.

In the exams: ICAR AICE subject 71 Unit 3 (disasters, adaptation); UPSC CSE GS-III (disaster management); UGC NET Unit 10; GATE ES Section 8

Where the 22 questions fall

How our questions for EPSO Administrator competitions spread across the units of Climate Adaptation, Climate-Smart Agriculture & Disaster Risk. Difficulty: 7 easy, 13 medium, 2 hard.

Agromet advisories and early-warning systems3
Flood and cyclone preparedness in agriculture3
Vulnerability, exposure, hazard and risk2
Adaptive capacity and resilience frameworks2
Drought monitoring and drought management2
Risk transfer: crop insurance and index insurance as adaptation2
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction2
National Adaptation Plans and community-based adaptation2
Maladaptation and limits to adaptation2
Stress-tolerant varieties, crop diversification and shifting calendars1
Water-smart and soil-smart practices1

6 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Vulnerability, exposure, hazard and risk · medium

Why can design standards based only on historical flood or drought records understate future risk?

  1. Design standards ignore probability and are based only on the most recent event
  2. Climate change makes hazard statistics non-stationary, so past return periods shorten
  3. Return periods are fixed physical constants that cannot change with the climate
  4. Historical records always overstate extremes because older gauges read too high
Answer and working

B. Climate change makes hazard statistics non-stationary, so past return periods shorten

With a changing climate, the probability distribution of extremes shifts; a flood that was a 100-year event may become more frequent. Old gauges are not systematically biased high, return periods are statistical estimates, and standards are probability-based.

Further reading: See the manual sources: IPCC AR6 WGII, Sendai Framework, FAO CSA Sourcebook and the documents named in the explanation

2 · Agromet advisories and early-warning systems · medium

What distinguishes anticipatory action (forecast-based financing) from conventional disaster response?

  1. Funds are released only after a government formally declares a national disaster
  2. Funds are spent on rebuilding infrastructure years after the event has passed
  3. Funds are raised by public appeal only after damage has been assessed in the field
  4. Pre-agreed funds flow when a forecast crosses a trigger, before the shock peaks
Answer and working

D. Pre-agreed funds flow when a forecast crosses a trigger, before the shock peaks

Anticipatory action ties pre-arranged finance to forecast triggers, so cash, feed or seed reaches people before impacts peak. Appeals, declarations and reconstruction are post-event mechanisms.

Further reading: See the manual sources: IPCC AR6 WGII, Sendai Framework, FAO CSA Sourcebook and the documents named in the explanation

3 · Risk transfer: crop insurance and index insurance as adaptation · medium

How can heavily subsidised crop insurance become maladaptive?

  1. Subsidised insurance prevents governments from investing in any early-warning system
  2. Subsidies always make insurance unaffordable, so no farmer can ever buy cover
  3. Insurance payouts directly increase greenhouse gas emissions from the insurer's offices
  4. Risk-blind premiums keep farmers growing unsuitable crops in unsuitable places
Answer and working

D. Risk-blind premiums keep farmers growing unsuitable crops in unsuitable places

Risk-blind subsidies weaken the price signal that would encourage shifting crops or locations as risk rises, locking in exposure. Subsidies lower, not raise, prices; emissions and early warning are unrelated.

Further reading: See the manual sources: IPCC AR6 WGII, Sendai Framework, FAO CSA Sourcebook and the documents named in the explanation

4 · Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction · medium

Sendai target (c) aims to reduce direct disaster economic loss in relation to what?

  1. Total global population count
  2. Global gross domestic product
  3. Global carbon dioxide emissions
  4. Total agricultural land area
Answer and working

B. Global gross domestic product

Target (c) is to reduce direct disaster economic loss in relation to global GDP by 2030. Mortality and affected people are normalised by population in the related indicators.

Further reading: See the manual sources: IPCC AR6 WGII, Sendai Framework, FAO CSA Sourcebook and the documents named in the explanation

5 · Maladaptation and limits to adaptation · medium

Which groups did AR6 identify as already experiencing soft limits to adaptation?

  1. Urban financial institutions with diversified global portfolios
  2. Large commercial farms with full insurance in high-income countries
  3. No groups, because soft limits are only projected for after 2100
  4. Some small-scale farmers and households in low-lying coastal areas
Answer and working

D. Some small-scale farmers and households in low-lying coastal areas

AR6 reported soft limits for some smallholders and households along low-lying coasts. They are already occurring, not only projected.

Further reading: See the manual sources: IPCC AR6 WGII, Sendai Framework, FAO CSA Sourcebook and the documents named in the explanation

6 · Maladaptation and limits to adaptation · hard

A coastal programme pays farmers to switch from rice to brackish shrimp ponds as salinity rises. What maladaptation risk should evaluators check?

  1. A rise in sea level caused by the excavation of the shrimp ponds
  2. A guaranteed fall in income for every shrimp farmer in the first season
  3. Salinised neighbouring land and lost jobs for labourers who worked in rice
  4. The complete elimination of greenhouse gas emissions from the district
Answer and working

C. Salinised neighbouring land and lost jobs for labourers who worked in rice

Shrimp farming can salinise adjacent fields and employs fewer people than rice, shifting vulnerability to others. Income effects vary, ponds do not raise sea level, and emissions are not eliminated.

Further reading: See the manual sources: IPCC AR6 WGII, Sendai Framework, FAO CSA Sourcebook and the documents named in the explanation

Ten here, 22 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to EPSO Administrator competitions in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Climate Adaptation, Climate-Smart Agriculture & Disaster RiskThe full study manual, free EPSO Administrator competitionsFormat, sections and how it has changed

Climate Adaptation, Climate-Smart Agriculture & Disaster Risk for other exams

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF · IndiaUGC NET · IndiaGARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate · International

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.