FSSC 22000 and ISO 22000 auditor qualification · Global · Foundation FSSC (scheme owner); certification bodies and auditor training providers
Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papersPrerequisite programmes, HACCP and the certified food safety systems dairy buyers and regulators require.
In the exams: ICAR AICE subject 35b Unit 1, subject 34 Unit 9 and subject 37 Unit 9; ICAR AIEEA-PG group 16 (ISO 9001 and ISO 22000)
How our questions for FSSC 22000 and ISO 22000 auditor qualification spread across the units of Dairy Food Safety Management Systems. Difficulty: 11 easy, 30 medium, 9 hard.
| Internal audit and certification audit | 9 | |
| ISO 22000 and FSSC 22000 | 8 | |
| BRCGS, SQF and GFSI benchmarking | 8 | |
| Food safety culture | 8 | |
| Traceability, recall and withdrawal | 5 | |
| Allergen management | 4 | |
| Prerequisite programmes and good manufacturing practice | 3 | |
| Food defence and food fraud vulnerability | 3 | |
| HACCP plans for pasteurised milk, cheese, powder and ice cream | 2 |
Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.
FSSC 22000 certification for a dairy plant combines ISO 22000, FSSC additional requirements and which other document?
B. ISO/TS 22002-1
For food manufacturing the PRP specification is ISO/TS 22002-1. ISO 14001 is environmental management, ISO 45001 occupational health and safety, and ISO 50001 energy management.
A dairy certified to FSSC 22000 for liquid milk starts making a plant-based drink on shared equipment. What should it do?
B. Extend the hazard analysis and notify its certification body
Certification covers the stated scope; new products, especially on shared equipment with allergen and process changes, need hazard analysis and notification. The certificate does not automatically cover new products, and a different scheme is not needed.
What does the Global Food Safety Initiative do?
A. Benchmarks and recognises certification programmes
GFSI benchmarks scheme owners' programmes against its requirements and recognises those that meet them. It does not certify sites, set legal limits, or accredit laboratories.
In BRCGS Food Safety, what is the effect of an unannounced audit option?
C. The site is audited without notice and can earn a higher grade
The unannounced option tests the site as it normally runs and is rewarded in grading. It does not remove audits, extend scope to other sites, or exempt fundamentals.
A small dairy wants to start toward GFSI-recognised certification but lacks basic systems. Which route fits GFSI's design?
A. A staged capacity-building programme, then full certification
GFSI supports staged programmes for smaller businesses; some schemes offer fundamentals levels. ISO 9001 and national licences are not GFSI recognition, and auditing a site that lacks basic systems leads to failure.
Why should internal auditors not audit their own work?
C. To keep the audit objective and impartial
Independence protects objectivity. Fees, confidentiality and reducing findings are not the reason.
An auditor finds that a pasteuriser recorder has not been checked against the indicating thermometer as the procedure requires. The plant fixes the check that day. What else is needed to close the finding properly?
C. Root-cause analysis and corrective action to prevent recurrence
A correction fixes the instance; corrective action addresses the root cause, such as training or unclear responsibility. Replacing equipment or removing the check does not address why it was missed.
In an audit, which finding would most likely be graded critical rather than major?
A. Release to customers of product known to be unsafe
Release of unsafe product is an immediate food safety risk and a critical finding. A missing signature, late report or training record update are minor or major depending on scope.
An internal audit programme schedules every area once a year. Two areas had repeated findings last year. What is the better approach?
B. Audit higher-risk areas and those with past findings more often
Audit programmes should be risk-based, auditing high-risk and poor-performing areas more frequently. The other choices ignore risk or remove a required activity.
A dairy sees a rise in near-miss reports after a culture programme. How should this be read?
C. Possibly a good sign of more willingness to report
More near-miss reports often reflect better reporting culture; it must be read with other indicators. It does not prove the plant is less safe or that reporting should be discouraged.
Ten here, 50 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to FSSC 22000 and ISO 22000 auditor qualification in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.
Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.
An AI operating system for agriculture: free guides, manuals and tools written for every country.