GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk (SCR) Certificate · International · Global Association of Risk Professionals
Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papersCounting greenhouse gases for nations, organisations, farms and products: IPCC inventory guidelines, the GHG Protocol corporate and Scope 3 standards, land-sector guidance, ISO 14064, emission factors and tiers, and science-based targets.
In the exams: GARP SCR 'Transition Planning and Carbon Reporting'; ISO 14064 verifier courses; sustainability reporting roles; GATE ES Section 9
How our questions for GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate spread across the units of Carbon Accounting & Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Difficulty: 2 easy, 11 medium, 8 hard.
| Science-based targets and net-zero standards, including FLAG | 5 | |
| GHG Protocol Corporate Standard: boundaries, Scopes 1 and 2 | 4 | |
| Scope 3 categories and supply-chain emissions | 3 | |
| Base years, recalculation and targets | 3 | |
| Why and how GHGs are accounted; CO2-equivalence | 2 | |
| Land-sector and removals accounting for companies | 2 | |
| Verification and assurance of GHG statements | 2 |
Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.
Under the GHG Protocol, how is CO2 released when a food factory burns wood chips in its boiler reported?
D. Separately, outside the scopes, as biogenic CO2, while the CH4 and N2O from the boiler are included in Scope 1
Biogenic CO2 from combustion is reported separately from the scopes; non-CO2 gases from the same combustion are in Scope 1. Counting it fully in Scope 1 ignores the separate-reporting rule; treating it as zero with no disclosure drops a required item; and the wood's upstream emissions (harvest, chipping, transport) belong in Scope 3, but its combustion CO2 does not.
A dairy processor's covered lagoon captures and flares 4.0 t of biogenic CH4 that previously escaped. Using AR6 non-fossil CH4 GWP100 = 27.0, by how much does its Scope 1 total fall, given that flaring turns the methane into biogenic CO2 reported outside the scopes?
C. 108.0 t CO2e
Scope 1 falls by the methane avoided: 4.0 x 27.0 = 108.0 t CO2e. The 11.0 t of CO2 formed (4.0 x 44/16) is biogenic and outside the scopes, so subtracting it (97.0) is wrong here. 119.2 uses the fossil-methane GWP. Ignoring small CH4 slip and flare N2O, which a full calculation would add back.
A food company owns 40% of a joint-venture processing plant and has operational control of it. The plant emits 10,000 t CO2e. How much does the company report in Scope 1 under the operational control approach?
D. 10,000 t CO2e
Under a control approach the company reports 100% of operations it controls: 10,000 t. 4,000 t is the equity-share answer; 6,000 t is the partner's equity share; reporting nothing in Scope 1 would apply only if the company had no control.
When must a company report both location-based and market-based Scope 2 under the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance (2015)?
D. When it has operations in markets where product- or supplier-specific contractual instruments are available
Dual reporting is required for companies with operations in markets providing contractual instruments; elsewhere the location-based figure is reported. It does not depend on a certificate share or on factor comparisons, and choosing only one method is not allowed where instruments exist.
A supplier cleared 100 ha of forest holding 150 t C/ha to plant soy, and the cleared land holds negligible carbon. Spreading land-use change emissions equally over a 20-year assessment period, what is the annual LUC emission attributed to the soy from that land?
C. 2,750 t CO2 per year
Stock lost = 100 x 150 = 15,000 t C; x 44/12 = 55,000 t CO2; / 20 = 2,750 t per year. 55,000 puts everything in one year; 750 is carbon, not CO2; 27.5 is per hectare.
Under the GHG Protocol's land-sector and removals rules, how should a food company present a soil-carbon removal on its supplier farms alongside its agricultural emissions?
D. Report removals separately from emissions, not netted, with evidence of storage, traceability and uncertainty
Removals are reported separately from emissions, and must meet requirements for ongoing storage monitoring, traceability, quantification with uncertainty and reversal accounting. Netting hides gross emissions; value-chain removals can be reported without turning them into credits; and one-off reporting ignores the monitoring obligation.
Which change does NOT trigger recalculation of base-year emissions under the GHG Protocol?
A. Organic growth, such as higher output from existing plants
Base years are not recalculated for organic growth or decline. Structural changes involving facilities that existed in the base year, methodology changes and significant errors are all triggers.
A grain processor sets an intensity target of 30% below its base-year 1.5 t CO2e per t of product. Base-year output was 10,000 t; target-year output is 14,000 t. If it meets the target exactly, what are its target-year absolute emissions?
B. 14,700 t CO2e
Target intensity = 1.5 x 0.70 = 1.05; x 14,000 = 14,700 t, only 2% below the base-year 15,000 t. 10,500 treats it as an absolute target; 21,000 ignores the intensity cut; 15,000 is simply the base-year total, assuming intensity and output changes cancel.
A company's 2020 base-year Scope 1 and 2 emissions are 100,000 t CO2e. Applying the 1.5 degrees C absolute contraction rate of 4.2% per year (linear) to 2030, what is the target-year level?
D. 58,000 t CO2e
Linear: 4.2% x 10 years = 42%; 100,000 x 0.58 = 58,000 t. 65,111 compounds the rate (a weaker target); 42,000 is the reduction itself, not the remaining level; 95,800 applies only one year.
Which standard was issued by the IAASB specifically for assurance engagements on greenhouse gas statements?
B. ISAE 3410
ISAE 3410 covers GHG statements (under the umbrella ISAE 3000). ISAE 3402 covers controls at service organisations, ISO 14065 is the ISO standard for verification bodies (not IAASB), and ISA 700 covers auditor's reports on financial statements.
Ten here, 21 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.
Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.
An AI operating system for agriculture: free guides, manuals and tools written for every country.