LAISHA
Open Laisha

GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate Carbon Markets, Offsets & Payments for Ecosystem Services: practice questions

GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk (SCR) Certificate · International · Global Association of Risk Professionals

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
19written to this exam in this subject
10syllabus units

What this subject covers

How carbon is priced and traded and what makes a credit credible: compliance emission trading schemes, Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, voluntary markets, agricultural and land-based project methods, and integrity issues. The economic theory of emissions trading versus taxes is in the Agribusiness subject natural-resource-environmental-economics; this subject covers market design, project methods and integrity in detail.

In the exams: ICAR AICE subject 71 Unit 3 (CDM, carbon credit); GARP SCR 'Green and Sustainable Finance'; UPSC CSE GS-III; carbon project developer and verifier roles

Where the 19 questions fall

How our questions for GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate spread across the units of Carbon Markets, Offsets & Payments for Ecosystem Services. Difficulty: 1 easy, 13 medium, 5 hard.

Integrity initiatives: core carbon principles and claims guidance4
Major compliance markets and their design features3
Voluntary carbon market structure: standards, registries, buyers3
Carbon pricing instruments: taxes and emission trading schemes2
From the Kyoto mechanisms (CDM, JI) to Paris Article 6.2 and 6.42
Credit integrity: additionality, baselines, leakage, permanence1
Avoidance versus removal credits1
REDD+ and nature-based credits (forest detail in the Forestry track)1
Validation, verification and buffer pools1
Corresponding adjustments and double counting1

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Carbon pricing instruments: taxes and emission trading schemes · hard

A company sets an internal 'shadow' carbon price for investment appraisal. What does this do?

  1. Charges each business unit a real fee per tonne, which the national tax authority then collects as a levy
  2. Adds a notional cost per tonne to project cash flows so that high-emitting options look less attractive
  3. Creates allowances that the company can sell on the national ETS when its projects cut emissions
  4. Fixes the company's emissions at a cap, beyond which no new projects may be approved for any reason
Answer and working

B. Adds a notional cost per tonne to project cash flows so that high-emitting options look less attractive

A shadow price is a notional cost used in appraisal; no money changes hands. An internal fee is a different design (real transfers within the company, not to a tax authority); neither creates ETS allowances or a hard cap.

2 · Major compliance markets and their design features · medium

What does the EU ETS Market Stability Reserve do?

  1. Fixes the allowance price at a floor set each year by the European Central Bank for all covered sectors
  2. Withdraws allowances from auction when the surplus in circulation is high and releases them when it is low
  3. Holds buffer credits from forestry projects to cover reversals in the EU's land-use sector accounts
  4. Lends allowances to installations that cannot afford to comply, to be repaid with interest within five years
Answer and working

B. Withdraws allowances from auction when the surplus in circulation is high and releases them when it is low

The MSR (operating since 2019) adjusts auction volumes according to the total number of allowances in circulation. It is not a price floor, not a forestry buffer, and not a lending facility.

3 · Major compliance markets and their design features · hard

Australia's reformed Safeguard Mechanism sets declining baselines for large facilities. A facility emits below its baseline. What happens?

  1. It is issued Safeguard Mechanism Credits for the difference, which it may sell to other facilities
  2. Its baseline for later years is raised by the amount of the difference, as a reward for early action
  3. It must pay a carbon tax on the difference, because the scheme charges every tonne below the baseline it sets
  4. Nothing: facilities below baseline are removed from the scheme and lose all rights to trade credits
Answer and working

A. It is issued Safeguard Mechanism Credits for the difference, which it may sell to other facilities

The scheme is baseline-and-credit: SMCs for performance below baseline; facilities above baseline surrender SMCs or ACCUs. Raising baselines, charging tax below baseline, or expelling good performers are not features of it.

4 · From the Kyoto mechanisms (CDM, JI) to Paris Article 6.2 and 6.4 · medium

The Article 6.4 mechanism issues 100,000 A6.4ERs for a project. 5% go to the Adaptation Fund as share of proceeds and 2% are cancelled for overall mitigation in global emissions (OMGE), both taken at issuance. How many units does the project participant receive?

  1. 95,000
  2. 98,000
  3. 93,000
  4. 90,000
Answer and working

C. 93,000

100,000 - 5% (5,000) - 2% (2,000) = 93,000. 95,000 forgets OMGE; 98,000 applies only OMGE (or the old CDM 2%); 90,000 is an invented 10% deduction.

5 · Voluntary carbon market structure: standards, registries, buyers · medium

Under ICAO's CORSIA, from 2024 what is the baseline above which international aviation emissions must be offset?

  1. 100% of 2019 emissions
  2. 100% of 2005 emissions
  3. 85% of 2019 emissions
  4. Average of 2019 and 2020
Answer and working

C. 85% of 2019 emissions

From 2024 the CORSIA baseline is 85% of 2019 emissions. The pilot phase (2021-2023) used 2019 emissions; the 2019-2020 average was the original design before COVID-19 distorted 2020; 2005 is an EU-style reference year, not CORSIA's.

6 · Credit integrity: additionality, baselines, leakage, permanence · medium

Which baseline choice is the most common cause of over-crediting?

  1. A baseline that is updated with observed data from matched control areas over the crediting period
  2. A baseline set conservatively below historical trends to allow for uncertainty
  3. A baseline standardised for a whole jurisdiction and allocated across its projects
  4. A baseline projecting more emissions or deforestation than would really have happened
Answer and working

D. A baseline projecting more emissions or deforestation than would really have happened

Inflated counterfactuals create credits for tonnes that were never at risk. Dynamic, conservative and jurisdictional baselines are responses to that problem.

7 · REDD+ and nature-based credits (forest detail in the Forestry track) · medium

What did independent studies comparing many voluntary REDD+ projects with synthetic control areas find?

  1. Many project baselines overstated the deforestation that would have occurred, so many credits lacked real reductions
  2. Deforestation inside project areas was higher than in matched control areas, proving that projects increased clearing
  3. No difference could be measured in any project, so remote sensing cannot be used to evaluate REDD+ at all
  4. Project baselines understated deforestation, so projects had received far fewer credits than they deserved
Answer and working

A. Many project baselines overstated the deforestation that would have occurred, so many credits lacked real reductions

Counterfactual studies found substantial over-crediting in many projects, which prompted new methodologies with dynamic and jurisdictional baselines. They did not find general under-crediting, consistently higher clearing inside projects, or that evaluation is impossible.

8 · Validation, verification and buffer pools · medium

A wildfire releases 10,000 t CO2 from a forest project whose credits were all sold. The reversal is judged unavoidable. Under typical buffer-pool rules, what happens?

  1. Nothing happens, because credits once issued cannot be affected by later carbon losses
  2. The project developer must buy 10,000 credits on the market and pay a penalty per tonne
  3. 10,000 credits are cancelled from the programme's buffer pool to cover the loss
  4. The buyers' retired credits are reinstated and 10,000 of them are re-sold to cover the loss
Answer and working

C. 10,000 credits are cancelled from the programme's buffer pool to cover the loss

Unavoidable reversals are covered by cancelling buffer credits; for avoidable reversals the developer usually must replace them. Retired credits are not un-retired, and ignoring reversals would defeat the buffer's purpose.

9 · Integrity initiatives: core carbon principles and claims guidance · medium

Before making any VCMI Claim, what must a company first show?

  1. That all its credits come from removal projects located in the same country as its headquarters
  2. A public science-aligned target with progress against it and transparent emissions reporting
  3. That it has been certified carbon neutral under ISO 14068-1 for at least three consecutive years
  4. That it has retired credits equal to at least 100% of its Scope 1 and 2 emissions in each year
Answer and working

B. A public science-aligned target with progress against it and transparent emissions reporting

VCMI's foundational criteria require a science-aligned near-term target and net-zero commitment, progress and disclosure. Coverage levels define the tier afterwards; there is no removals-only, home-country or ISO 14068-1 prerequisite.

10 · Corresponding adjustments and double counting · hard

Under Article 6.2, a host country may define the 'first transfer' of ITMOs authorised for other international mitigation purposes (such as CORSIA) as which event?

  1. Only the date the buyer's ship or aircraft leaves the host
  2. Authorisation, issuance or use of the mitigation outcome
  3. Only the year the project was first registered with the CDM
  4. Only the date of the host country's next NDC submission
Answer and working

B. Authorisation, issuance or use of the mitigation outcome

Article 6.2 guidance lets the participating Party specify first transfer as authorisation, issuance or use (or cancellation) for other international mitigation purposes. The other events are invented.

Ten here, 19 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Carbon Markets, Offsets & Payments for Ecosystem ServicesThe full study manual, free GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk CertificateFormat, sections and how it has changed

More GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate practice

Climate Finance, Climate Risk & Sustainable InvestmentSustainable Agri-food Supply Chains & Deforestation-free SourcingClimate System ScienceSustainability Reporting & ESG DisclosureClimate Models, Scenarios & DownscalingClimate Adaptation, Climate-Smart Agriculture & Disaster RiskEnvironmental Law, Policy & International AgreementsWetlands, Coastal Ecosystems & Blue CarbonCarbon Accounting & Greenhouse Gas InventoriesEnergy, Environment & Agri-energy Transitions

Carbon Markets, Offsets & Payments for Ecosystem Services for other exams

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF · India

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.