LAISHA
Open Laisha

Sustainability Excellence Associate and Sustainability Excellence Professional Sustainability Transitions, Governance & Social Dimensions: practice questions

Sustainability Excellence Associate (SEA) and Sustainability Excellence Professional (SEP) · International · Green Business Certification Inc., with the International Society of Sustainability Professionals as education partner

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
63written to this exam in this subject
10syllabus units

What this subject covers

The human side of sustainability: how socio-technical transitions happen, governance at multiple levels, behaviour change, gender and equity, stakeholder engagement, and leading change in organisations and communities.

In the exams: SEP (GBCI) stakeholder engagement and strategy domains; UGC NET Unit 10; senior and leadership roles

Where the 63 questions fall

How our questions for Sustainability Excellence Associate and Sustainability Excellence Professional spread across the units of Sustainability Transitions, Governance & Social Dimensions. Difficulty: 6 easy, 43 medium, 14 hard.

Just transition for farmers and rural workers9
Organisational sustainability strategy and change management9
Behaviour change and social norms8
Multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions7
Stakeholder mapping and engagement7
Communicating environmental science7
Environmental conflict and negotiation5
Science-policy interfaces: IPCC, IPBES and national bodies5
Gender and social inclusion in environmental programmes4
Polycentric and multi-level governance; commons governance2

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions · medium

In the multi-level perspective, what is a niche?

  1. Slow-changing external trends such as demographics and ideology
  2. A market segment that incumbent firms already dominate
  3. A protected space where radical innovations emerge and are nurtured
  4. The dominant configuration of rules, technologies and interests in a sector
Answer and working

C. A protected space where radical innovations emerge and are nurtured

Niches, such as pilot projects or subsidised early markets, shelter radical innovations. The regime is the dominant configuration; the landscape is the wider context.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

2 · Multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions · medium

Which approach, developed in the Netherlands by Rotmans, Loorbach and colleagues, uses transition arenas, visions and experiments to steer long-term change?

  1. Life-cycle assessment
  2. Cost–benefit analysis
  3. Transition management
  4. Strategic environmental assessment
Answer and working

C. Transition management

Transition management is a reflexive, participatory governance approach using arenas of frontrunners, visions and experiments. The others are assessment tools.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

3 · Polycentric and multi-level governance; commons governance · medium

What does polycentric governance describe?

  1. Governance by many cities in one country with identical rules
  2. A decision rule requiring unanimous agreement among all nations
  3. A single central government taking all environmental decisions
  4. Overlapping decision centres at several scales that interact
Answer and working

D. Overlapping decision centres at several scales that interact

Polycentric systems (V. and E. Ostrom) have many semi-autonomous, overlapping centres that cooperate and compete. They are not centralised, uniform or unanimity-based.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

4 · Stakeholder mapping and engagement · medium

Mitchell, Agle and Wood (1997) proposed that stakeholder salience depends on which three attributes?

  1. Power, legitimacy and urgency
  2. Wealth, age and education
  3. Interest, influence and location
  4. Size, sector and nationality
Answer and working

A. Power, legitimacy and urgency

Salience rises with the number of attributes held among power, legitimacy and urgency; stakeholders with all three are definitive.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

5 · Stakeholder mapping and engagement · medium

Which list gives the five levels of the IAP2 spectrum of public participation, in order of increasing public influence?

  1. Listen, explain, decide, announce, defend
  2. Consult, inform, empower, involve, collaborate
  3. Inform, consult, involve, collaborate, empower
  4. Plan, do, check, act, review
Answer and working

C. Inform, consult, involve, collaborate, empower

IAP2: inform, consult, involve, collaborate, empower. The other sequences are reordered or unrelated.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

6 · Stakeholder mapping and engagement · hard

Why can stakeholder mapping based mainly on power lead to poor outcomes in agricultural projects?

  1. Low-power groups always oppose projects, so including them causes delay
  2. It sidelines women, landless workers and others with little power
  3. Mapping by power is prohibited by international engagement standards
  4. Powerful stakeholders never influence project outcomes in agriculture
Answer and working

B. It sidelines women, landless workers and others with little power

Focusing on power may exclude those most affected; good practice deliberately seeks out marginalised groups. Powerful actors do matter, mapping by power is not prohibited, and inclusion often improves projects.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

7 · Gender and social inclusion in environmental programmes · medium

Which practice best supports women's participation in agricultural programmes where social norms limit mixed meetings?

  1. Collecting data only from household heads, who are mostly men
  2. Delivering all information through written manuals in a national language
  3. Separate consultations timed to fit women's workloads
  4. Requiring women to attend evening meetings chaired by men only
Answer and working

C. Separate consultations timed to fit women's workloads

Separate, well-timed sessions, sometimes with women facilitators, enable women to participate and be heard. The other practices exclude women.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

8 · Just transition for farmers and rural workers · medium

For smallholders in developing countries, which condition is especially important for a just transition?

  1. Immediate removal of all support for small farms
  2. Full responsibility for historical global emissions
  3. Secure land tenure and access to finance and markets
  4. Mandatory adoption of the most expensive technologies
Answer and working

C. Secure land tenure and access to finance and markets

Tenure, finance and market access enable smallholders to invest and participate; poor farmers have low historical responsibility for emissions.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

9 · Environmental conflict and negotiation · medium

Which is one of the four elements of principled negotiation in Getting to Yes?

  1. Never reveal any information to the other side
  2. Focus on interests, not positions
  3. Treat the other party as the problem to be defeated
  4. Make the first offer as extreme as possible
Answer and working

B. Focus on interests, not positions

Principled negotiation: separate people from the problem, focus on interests, invent options for mutual gain, insist on objective criteria. Extreme anchoring and adversarial tactics are not its elements.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

10 · Communicating environmental science · medium

Which is good practice when communicating scientific uncertainty to the public?

  1. Hide all uncertainty to make the message sound more certain
  2. Replace numbers with vague words such as 'some' and 'maybe'
  3. Emphasise uncertainty so strongly that no conclusion seems possible
  4. Ranges, natural frequencies and calibrated terms with meanings
Answer and working

D. Ranges, natural frequencies and calibrated terms with meanings

Honest, understandable uncertainty, with ranges, frequencies and defined terms, builds trust; hiding or exaggerating uncertainty misleads.

Further reading: See the manual sources: the original works named in the explanation (Geels, Ostrom, Arnstein, Ajzen, Rogers, Fisher and Ury, IPBES, Kotter)

Ten here, 63 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to Sustainability Excellence Associate and Sustainability Excellence Professional in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Sustainability Transitions, Governance & Social DimensionsThe full study manual, free Sustainability Excellence Associate and Sustainability Excellence ProfessionalFormat, sections and how it has changed

More Sustainability Excellence Associate and Sustainability Excellence Professional practice

Sustainable Agri-food Supply Chains & Deforestation-free SourcingCircular Economy & Bio-based ResourcesSustainability Reporting & ESG DisclosureSustainable Food Systems, Diets & Food LossSustainability Science: Concepts, History & EthicsEnvironmental Management Systems, Auditing & StandardsLife Cycle AssessmentEnergy, Environment & Agri-energy Transitions

Sustainability Transitions, Governance & Social Dimensions for other exams

UGC NET · IndiaISEP membership grades and Chartered Environmentalist · UK / international

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.