LAISHA
Open Laisha

NEBOSH Environmental Management Certificate Environmental Management Systems, Auditing & Standards: practice questions

NEBOSH Environmental Management Certificate (EMC) · UK / international · National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
43written to this exam in this subject
8syllabus units

What this subject covers

Running environmental performance inside an organisation: ISO 14001 and the ISO 14000 family, environmental aspects and impacts, auditing, eco-labels and the voluntary sustainability standards that farms and agri-food firms are certified against.

In the exams: GATE ES Section 9 (EMS, ISO 14000, auditing); ICAR AICE subject 71 Unit 3 (environmental auditing); NEBOSH EMC; ISO 14001 lead auditor

What NEBOSH Environmental Management Certificate asks from it

NEBOSH Environmental Management Certificate and ISO 14001 lead auditor training

Applying ISO 14001 clauses, building an aspects register and scoring significance, compliance obligations and evaluation, ISO 19011 principles and audit process, nonconformity grading, certification cycle and multi-site sampling.

Where the 43 questions fall

How our questions for NEBOSH Environmental Management Certificate spread across the units of Environmental Management Systems, Auditing & Standards. Difficulty: 10 easy, 22 medium, 11 hard.

ISO 14001: context, policy, planning, operation, evaluation, improvement8
Environmental aspects and impacts register8
Environmental performance indicators7
Integrating environment with quality and safety management6
The ISO 14000 family4
Legal compliance and evaluation4
Environmental auditing: types, process and auditor competence4
Eco-labelling: types I, II and III2

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · The ISO 14000 family · medium

Which national standard is regarded as the first environmental management system standard, a precursor of ISO 14001?

  1. ANSI Z10 (United States, 2005)
  2. BS 7750 (United Kingdom, 1992)
  3. DIN 4000 (Germany, 1981)
  4. JIS Q 9100 (Japan, 2004)
Answer and working

B. BS 7750 (United Kingdom, 1992)

BS 7750, published by the British Standards Institution in 1992, was the first EMS standard and influenced both EMAS and ISO 14001. The other codes are unrelated standards.

Further reading: Sheldon and Yoxon, EMS

2 · The ISO 14000 family · hard

What did the 2024 amendment to ISO 14001 (and other management system standards) add?

  1. A requirement for every certified organisation to become carbon neutral by 2030 at the latest
  2. A requirement to consider whether climate change is relevant to the organisation's context
  3. A ban on certifying organisations in the agriculture and food sector
  4. A requirement to replace internal audits with annual government inspections
Answer and working

B. A requirement to consider whether climate change is relevant to the organisation's context

The 2024 climate action amendment added to clauses 4.1 and 4.2 that the organisation shall determine whether climate change is a relevant issue and that interested parties can have climate-related requirements. It set no neutrality target, sector ban or change to audits.

Further reading: ISO 14001:2015/Amd 1:2024

3 · ISO 14001: context, policy, planning, operation, evaluation, improvement · medium

In ISO 14001:2015, which term replaced the separate terms 'documents' and 'records'?

  1. Controlled forms
  2. Evidence files
  3. Documented information
  4. Procedural manuals
Answer and working

C. Documented information

The 2015 revision uses 'documented information' for information an organisation must control and maintain, whether as documents or retained evidence. The other terms are not used in the standard.

Further reading: ISO 14001:2015

4 · Environmental aspects and impacts register · medium

An aspects register scores significance = severity × likelihood (each 1–5) with a threshold of 12. Slurry store overflow has severity 5 and likelihood 3; office paper use has severity 2 and likelihood 4. Which statement is correct?

  1. Slurry overflow scores 8 and paper scores 15, so only paper is significant
  2. Slurry overflow, at 15, is significant; paper, at 8, is not
  3. Both score above 12, so both are significant under the stated criteria
  4. Slurry overflow scores 8 and paper 6, so neither is significant
Answer and working

B. Slurry overflow, at 15, is significant; paper, at 8, is not

Slurry: 5 × 3 = 15 ≥ 12, significant; paper: 2 × 4 = 8 < 12, not significant. Adding the scores (8 and 6) uses the wrong formula; swapping the scores or calling both significant misreads the data.

5 · Environmental aspects and impacts register · medium

Which data source is most useful for identifying aspects of a food processing line?

  1. The company's advertising budget and its list of marketing campaigns for the year
  2. The personal opinions of the managing director, collected without any site visit
  3. An input–output balance of materials, energy, water, products, wastes and emissions
  4. The share price history of the parent company over the last ten years
Answer and working

C. An input–output balance of materials, energy, water, products, wastes and emissions

Process flow diagrams with input–output balances, site walks, monitoring data, incidents and complaints reveal where the process interacts with the environment. Advertising, unsupported opinion and share prices do not.

Further reading: ISO 14004:2016

6 · Environmental aspects and impacts register · hard

A dairy scores aspects with severity × likelihood and treats 12 as the threshold. An effluent discharge subject to a permit limit scores 9. What is good practice?

  1. Treat it as significant because it is subject to a legal requirement, and document this rule
  2. Ignore it, because the numerical score is below the threshold and the score cannot be overridden
  3. Delete it from the register so that auditors cannot question the score
  4. Raise the threshold to 20 so that fewer aspects become significant
Answer and working

A. Treat it as significant because it is subject to a legal requirement, and document this rule

Many registers treat any aspect with a legal limit, recent complaint or stakeholder concern as significant regardless of score, because criteria must include compliance obligations. Ignoring, deleting or moving the threshold to suit is poor practice.

Further reading: ISO 14001:2015, 6.1.2

7 · Environmental performance indicators · easy

Water intensity falls from 4.0 to 3.4 m³ per tonne. What is the percentage improvement?

  1. 0.6 %
  2. 18 %
  3. 85 %
  4. 15 %
Answer and working

D. 15 %

Improvement = (4.0 − 3.4)/4.0 = 15 %. 0.6 is the absolute change; 18 % divides by the new value (0.6/3.4); 85 % is the new value as a share of the old.

8 · Environmental performance indicators · hard

A plant processing 13000 t at 4.0 m³/t cuts intensity to 3.4 m³/t while throughput rises 20 %. What happens to absolute water use?

  1. It falls from 52000 to 44200 m³
  2. It stays at 52000 m³
  3. It rises from 52000 to 53040 m³
  4. It falls from 52000 to 41600 m³
Answer and working

C. It rises from 52000 to 53040 m³

New use = 3.4 × (13000 × 1.2) = 3.4 × 15600 = 53040 m³, above 52000: intensity improved 15 % but absolute use rose. 44200 ignores the throughput rise; 52000 assumes no change; 41600 wrongly subtracts the 20 % throughput change instead of adding it.

9 · Environmental performance indicators · easy

A food factory generates 240 t of waste, of which 180 t is sent to recycling, composting or digestion. What is its waste diversion rate?

  1. 75 %
  2. 25 %
  3. 133 %
  4. 60 %
Answer and working

A. 75 %

Diversion = 180/240 = 75 %. 25 % is the share landfilled; 133 % inverts the ratio; 60 % is a subtraction slip (240 − 180 = 60).

10 · Environmental auditing: types, process and auditor competence · medium

Which finding would a certification auditor normally grade as a major nonconformity?

  1. One training record is missing a signature among many complete records
  2. A waste label is faded but the waste is correctly segregated and recorded
  3. The policy is displayed in one canteen but not in a second canteen
  4. No internal audit of the EMS has ever been done
Answer and working

D. No internal audit of the EMS has ever been done

A complete absence or breakdown of a required element, such as internal audit, raises doubt about the system's ability to achieve outcomes and is major. Isolated lapses in an otherwise working control are usually minor.

Further reading: ISO/IEC 17021-1

Ten here, 43 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to NEBOSH Environmental Management Certificate in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Environmental Management Systems, Auditing & StandardsThe full study manual, free NEBOSH Environmental Management CertificateFormat, sections and how it has changed

Environmental Management Systems, Auditing & Standards for other exams

Sustainability Excellence Associate and Sustainability Excellence Professional · InternationalUGC NET · IndiaISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems Lead Auditor · InternationalGATE · India

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.