UGC NET — Environmental Sciences (subject code 89) · India · National Testing Agency for the University Grants Commission
Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papersMinimum soil disturbance, permanent soil cover and diversified rotations, and the looser 'regenerative' label built around them: the evidence on yields, soil carbon and water, and how outcome-based regenerative claims are verified.
In the exams: ICAR AICE Agronomy and Soil Science (conservation agriculture); CCA Sustainability specialty; agri-food company sustainability roles
UGC NET Environmental Sciences
Soil conservation and land degradation, carbon sequestration and sustainable agriculture in the context of environmental management.
How our questions for UGC NET spread across the units of Conservation & Regenerative Agriculture. Difficulty: 2 easy, 8 medium, 5 hard.
| The three principles of conservation agriculture | 4 | |
| Effects on soil health, water infiltration and erosion | 3 | |
| Regenerative agriculture: definitions and outcome frameworks | 3 | |
| Residue retention and mulching | 1 | |
| Crop diversification and rotations | 1 | |
| Effects on yields: evidence by climate and soil | 1 | |
| Managed and adaptive grazing | 1 | |
| No-till and reduced tillage systems | 1 |
Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.
In the Universal Soil Loss Equation, keeping more residue on the surface lowers which factor?
D. C, the cover-management factor
Residue and cover reduce C. R depends on rainfall, K on soil properties, LS on topography.
Despite agronomic benefits, rice-wheat farmers in north-west India rarely diversify. Which explanation fits the evidence?
C. Procurement and price support favour rice and wheat; markets for alternatives are weaker
Policy and markets (procurement, minimum support prices) shape crop choice; alternatives face weaker markets and risk.
What does the USLE term A represent?
A. Average annual soil loss per unit area
A is predicted average annual soil loss (e.g. t/ha/yr), from A = R x K x LS x C x P.
Powlson and colleagues (2014) and Luo and colleagues (2010) concluded that the climate mitigation potential of no-till:
B. Has often been overstated, as whole-profile carbon gains are frequently small
No-till raises surface SOC but deeper layers may lose carbon; whole-profile gains are often small, though other benefits remain.
An advantage of outcome-based definitions of regenerative agriculture is that they:
A. Reward measured results and allow practices to fit local conditions
Outcome-based approaches reward results and flexibility, but outcomes such as soil carbon are slow and costly to measure.
Compared with agroecology, regenerative agriculture as usually defined:
A. Gives less weight to social and political dimensions such as governance and equity
Both emphasise ecological practices, but agroecology's frameworks include more social and governance principles.
Which claim about holistic or adaptive grazing is most contested by rangeland scientists?
C. That it can reverse desertification widely and offset much of global emissions
The large-scale claims lack controlled evidence; the other statements reflect mainstream grazing science.
Which statement correctly distinguishes no-till from conservation agriculture?
D. No-till is one practice; CA combines it with permanent cover and diversification
CA is a system of three principles; no-till is only the minimum-disturbance part.
Ten here, 15 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to UGC NET in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.
Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.
An AI operating system for agriculture: free guides, manuals and tools written for every country.