LAISHA
Open Laisha

CUET-PG Statistical Inference II: Testing of Hypotheses & Sequential Analysis: practice questions

CUET-PG - Statistics · India · National Testing Agency

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
70written to this exam in this subject
11syllabus units

What this subject covers

The logic and optimality of tests: errors and power, the Neyman-Pearson lemma, uniformly most powerful and unbiased tests, likelihood-ratio tests and their large-sample forms, and Wald's sequential probability ratio test.

In the exams: AICE-JRF Ag Stat Units 1-2 incl. SPRT (heavy); GATE ST 'Testing of Hypotheses' (heavy); IIT JAM MS (heavy); UPSC ISS Statistics I-II (heavy)

What CUET-PG asks from it

ICAR AIEEA-PG Group 07, CUET-PG Statistics, SSC JSO and state statistical services

Two types of error, level of significance, and the z, t, chi-square and F tests applied to agricultural data.

Where the 70 questions fall

How our questions for CUET-PG spread across the units of Statistical Inference II: Testing of Hypotheses & Sequential Analysis. Difficulty: 31 easy, 34 medium, 5 hard.

Tests based on Z, t, chi-square and F distributions12
Hypotheses, the two types of error, size and power9
Power and sample-size calculation for common tests8
Multiple testing: family-wise error rate and false discovery rate7
Neyman-Pearson lemma and most powerful tests6
Wald and score (Rao) tests6
Monotone likelihood ratio and uniformly most powerful tests5
Unbiased tests and UMPU tests for exponential families5
Likelihood ratio tests and Wilks' theorem5
Relation between tests and confidence intervals5
Sequential probability ratio test: OC and ASN functions2

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Hypotheses, the two types of error, size and power · easy

What is the power of a test at a particular alternative θ₁?

  1. The probability of accepting H₀ when θ₁ is the true value
  2. The probability of rejecting H₀ when θ₁ is the true value
  3. The probability that H₁ is true given the observed data
  4. The probability of rejecting H₀ when H₀ is in fact true
Answer and working

B. The probability of rejecting H₀ when θ₁ is the true value

Power = 1 − β(θ₁) = P_θ₁(reject H₀). Accepting H₀ under θ₁ is the Type II error probability β; rejecting a true H₀ has probability α. The posterior probability of H₁ is a Bayesian quantity, not power.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

2 · Hypotheses, the two types of error, size and power · easy

Plot yields are N(μ, 16). From 16 plots, H₀: μ = 50 is rejected when x̄ > 51. What is the size of the test?

  1. 0.0500
  2. 0.1587
  3. 0.3173
  4. 0.4013
Answer and working

B. 0.1587

Under H₀, X̄ ~ N(50, 1), so α = P(X̄ > 51) = P(Z > 1) = 0.1587. Using σ = 4 instead of SE = 1 gives z = 0.25; doubling gives a two-sided figure that does not apply to this one-sided rule.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

3 · Monotone likelihood ratio and uniformly most powerful tests · medium

Under a monotone likelihood ratio in T, what does the Karlin-Rubin theorem give for H₀: θ ≤ θ₀ against H₁: θ > θ₀?

  1. A UMP level-α test that rejects for small T
  2. An LRT that is UMP only as n becomes large
  3. A UMPU test, though no UMP test exists here
  4. A UMP level-α test that rejects for large T
Answer and working

D. A UMP level-α test that rejects for large T

Karlin-Rubin: rejecting when T > c with P_θ₀(T > c) = α is UMP for the one-sided problem, and its power function is non-decreasing in θ.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

4 · Likelihood ratio tests and Wilks' theorem · easy

The generalised likelihood-ratio statistic for H₀: θ ∈ Θ₀ is Λ = sup_Θ₀ L(θ)/sup_Θ L(θ). When is H₀ rejected?

  1. When Λ exceeds 1, so the null fits better
  2. When Λ equals 0.5, the midpoint of its range
  3. When Λ is small, i.e. when −2 log Λ is large
  4. When Λ is large, close to its maximum of 1
Answer and working

C. When Λ is small, i.e. when −2 log Λ is large

Λ lies in [0, 1]; values near 1 mean the restricted model fits nearly as well as the full one, small values mean H₀ fits poorly. Λ cannot exceed 1 because the full maximum is at least the restricted one.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

5 · Tests based on Z, t, chi-square and F distributions · medium

A 2 × 2 table of adoption (yes/no) by training (yes/no) has cells a = 30, b = 20, c = 10, d = 40. What is Pearson's χ² without continuity correction?

  1. 16.67
  2. 4.08
  3. 15.04
  4. 0.17
Answer and working

A. 16.67

χ² = n(ad − bc)²/[(a + b)(c + d)(a + c)(b + d)] = 100 × 1000²/(50 × 50 × 40 × 60) = 16.67, with 1 df. With Yates' correction it is 15.04; omitting n gives 0.17.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

6 · Tests based on Z, t, chi-square and F distributions · medium

Germination is 45 of 100 seeds for treated and 30 of 100 for untreated seed. What is the pooled two-proportion z-statistic?

  1. 2.191
  2. 3.098
  3. 2.218
  4. 32.000
Answer and working

A. 2.191

Pooled p̄ = 75/200 = 0.375; SE = √(0.375 × 0.625 × (1/100 + 1/100)) = 0.0685; z = 0.15/0.0685 = 2.191. The unpooled SE gives 2.218; forgetting the two sample sizes gives 3.098.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

7 · Tests based on Z, t, chi-square and F distributions · medium

In a 2 × 2 table one expected frequency is 3. What is the recommended analysis?

  1. Fisher's exact test, because the χ² approximation fails with small expected counts
  2. Pooling the table with another experiment until every cell exceeds 3
  3. The z-test for two proportions, because it never needs large expected counts in any cell
  4. Pearson's χ² without correction, because small counts make it more powerful
Answer and working

A. Fisher's exact test, because the χ² approximation fails with small expected counts

With expected counts below 5, the χ² approximation can be poor; Fisher's exact test (conditioning on the margins) is the standard alternative. Yates' correction is a cruder fix. The z-test for two proportions is equivalent to the uncorrected χ² and has the same problem.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

8 · Relation between tests and confidence intervals · easy

A 95% two-sided confidence interval for a mean difference is 0.1 to 0.5 t/ha. What does the corresponding 5% two-sided test conclude?

  1. It rejects neither, because the interval does not include 0.6
  2. It rejects both a difference of 0 and a difference of 0.3
  3. It rejects a difference of 0 and does not reject a difference of 0.3
  4. It rejects a difference of 0.3 and does not reject a difference of 0
Answer and working

C. It rejects a difference of 0 and does not reject a difference of 0.3

A two-sided level-α test rejects θ₀ exactly when θ₀ lies outside the 1 − α interval: 0 is outside, 0.3 inside.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

9 · Multiple testing: family-wise error rate and false discovery rate · medium

Four ordered p-values are 0.004, 0.011, 0.020 and 0.040. How many hypotheses does Holm's step-down procedure reject at family-wise level 0.05?

  1. 3
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 4
Answer and working

D. 4

Holm compares p₍ⱼ₎ with 0.05/(m − j + 1): 0.004 ≤ 0.0125, 0.011 ≤ 0.0167, 0.020 ≤ 0.025, 0.040 ≤ 0.05, so all four are rejected. Bonferroni (all at 0.0125) would reject only two.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

10 · Multiple testing: family-wise error rate and false discovery rate · easy

In a variety trial, eight new entries are each to be compared only with one check variety, with control of the family-wise error rate. Which procedure is designed for this?

  1. Duncan's multiple range test
  2. Scheffé's method
  3. Dunnett's test
  4. Tukey's HSD test
Answer and working

C. Dunnett's test

Dunnett's procedure handles many-to-one comparisons with a control and is more powerful there than Tukey's all-pairs method or Scheffé's all-contrasts method.

Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics

Ten here, 70 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to CUET-PG in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Statistical Inference II: Testing of Hypotheses & Sequential AnalysisThe full study manual, free CUET-PGFormat, sections and how it has changed

More CUET-PG practice

Probability TheoryStatistical Methods for Agricultural SciencesCategorical Data Analysis & Generalized Linear ModelsStatistical Inference I: EstimationNonparametric & Rank-Based MethodsProbability Distributions & Sampling DistributionsStatistical Quality Control & ReliabilityBioassay, Survival & Epidemiological StatisticsMultivariate AnalysisBayesian InferenceOptimization Techniques for StatisticiansStochastic ProcessesReal Analysis for StatisticsDemography & Vital Statistics

Statistical Inference II: Testing of Hypotheses & Sequential Analysis for other exams

GATE · IndiaIIT JAM · IndiaIndian Statistical Institute admission tests · IndiaState statistical services · IndiaICAR AICE-JRF/SRF · IndiaASRB NET · IndiaICAR AIEEA-PG · IndiaSSC Combined Graduate Level · IndiaCSIR-UGC NET · IndiaIndian Statistical Service Examination · IndiaASRB Agricultural Research Service · India

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.