ASRB NET - Agricultural Statistics (and Computer Application / Bioinformatics) · India · Agricultural Scientists Recruitment Board (ICAR)
Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papersThe logic and optimality of tests: errors and power, the Neyman-Pearson lemma, uniformly most powerful and unbiased tests, likelihood-ratio tests and their large-sample forms, and Wald's sequential probability ratio test.
In the exams: AICE-JRF Ag Stat Units 1-2 incl. SPRT (heavy); GATE ST 'Testing of Hypotheses' (heavy); IIT JAM MS (heavy); UPSC ISS Statistics I-II (heavy)
ASRB NET / ARS Agricultural Statistics
Choosing and interpreting tests for trial and survey data, multiple comparisons, sequential sampling for pests, and replication from power and CV.
How our questions for ASRB NET spread across the units of Statistical Inference II: Testing of Hypotheses & Sequential Analysis. Difficulty: 11 easy, 20 medium, 10 hard.
| Sequential probability ratio test: OC and ASN functions | 9 | |
| Multiple testing: family-wise error rate and false discovery rate | 6 | |
| Likelihood ratio tests and Wilks' theorem | 5 | |
| Power and sample-size calculation for common tests | 5 | |
| Tests based on Z, t, chi-square and F distributions | 4 | |
| Hypotheses, the two types of error, size and power | 3 | |
| Neyman-Pearson lemma and most powerful tests | 2 | |
| Monotone likelihood ratio and uniformly most powerful tests | 2 | |
| Unbiased tests and UMPU tests for exponential families | 2 | |
| Relation between tests and confidence intervals | 2 | |
| Wald and score (Rao) tests | 1 |
Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.
Plot yields are N(μ, 16). From 16 plots, H₀: μ = 50 is rejected in favour of H₁: μ = 52 when x̄ > 51.645. What is the power of the test?
A. 0.639
SE = 4/√16 = 1. Power = P(X̄ > 51.645 | μ = 52) = P(Z > −0.355) = 0.639. 0.050 is the size; 0.361 is β; using σ = 4 instead of the standard error gives 0.535.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Under a monotone likelihood ratio in T, what does the Karlin-Rubin theorem give for H₀: θ ≤ θ₀ against H₁: θ > θ₀?
D. A UMP level-α test that rejects for large T
Karlin-Rubin: rejecting when T > c with P_θ₀(T > c) = α is UMP for the one-sided problem, and its power function is non-decreasing in θ.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
In what sense is Fisher's exact test for a 2 × 2 table optimal?
B. Its randomised version is UMPU for the odds ratio, by conditioning on the margins
The margins are sufficient for the nuisance parameters; conditioning on them gives a hypergeometric null distribution, and the randomised conditional test is UMPU. The non-randomised version is conservative.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
The generalised likelihood-ratio statistic for H₀: θ ∈ Θ₀ is Λ = sup_Θ₀ L(θ)/sup_Θ L(θ). When is H₀ rejected?
C. When Λ is small, i.e. when −2 log Λ is large
Λ lies in [0, 1]; values near 1 mean the restricted model fits nearly as well as the full one, small values mean H₀ fits poorly. Λ cannot exceed 1 because the full maximum is at least the restricted one.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Germination is 45 of 100 seeds for treated and 30 of 100 for untreated seed. What is the pooled two-proportion z-statistic?
A. 2.191
Pooled p̄ = 75/200 = 0.375; SE = √(0.375 × 0.625 × (1/100 + 1/100)) = 0.0685; z = 0.15/0.0685 = 2.191. The unpooled SE gives 2.218; forgetting the two sample sizes gives 3.098.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
In a 2 × 2 table one expected frequency is 3. What is the recommended analysis?
A. Fisher's exact test, because the χ² approximation fails with small expected counts
With expected counts below 5, the χ² approximation can be poor; Fisher's exact test (conditioning on the margins) is the standard alternative. Yates' correction is a cruder fix. The z-test for two proportions is equivalent to the uncorrected χ² and has the same problem.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Four ordered p-values are 0.004, 0.011, 0.020 and 0.040. How many hypotheses does Holm's step-down procedure reject at family-wise level 0.05?
D. 4
Holm compares p₍ⱼ₎ with 0.05/(m − j + 1): 0.004 ≤ 0.0125, 0.011 ≤ 0.0167, 0.020 ≤ 0.025, 0.040 ≤ 0.05, so all four are rejected. Bonferroni (all at 0.0125) would reject only two.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
In a variety trial, eight new entries are each to be compared only with one check variety, with control of the family-wise error rate. Which procedure is designed for this?
C. Dunnett's test
Dunnett's procedure handles many-to-one comparisons with a control and is more powerful there than Tukey's all-pairs method or Scheffé's all-contrasts method.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
In Wald's SPRT with boundaries B < 1 < A on the likelihood ratio Λₙ = L₁/L₀, what is the rule after n observations?
C. Accept H₀ if Λₙ ≤ B, reject H₀ if Λₙ ≥ A, otherwise take another observation
Λₙ large favours H₁ (reject H₀); small favours H₀. Sampling continues while the ratio stays between the boundaries.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
After a non-significant trial, a scientist computes 'observed power' from the observed effect size. What is wrong with this?
D. Observed power is a function of the p-value and adds no information on the effect
Post-hoc power at the observed effect is a monotone transformation of the p-value; a non-significant result always has low 'observed power'. Power is a planning quantity, computed for a pre-specified effect.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Ten here, 41 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to ASRB NET in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.
Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.
An AI operating system for agriculture: free guides, manuals and tools written for every country.