ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF - Agricultural Statistics, Computer Application, Bioinformatics (PhD admission and fellowship) · India · National Testing Agency for ICAR
Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papersThe logic and optimality of tests: errors and power, the Neyman-Pearson lemma, uniformly most powerful and unbiased tests, likelihood-ratio tests and their large-sample forms, and Wald's sequential probability ratio test.
In the exams: AICE-JRF Ag Stat Units 1-2 incl. SPRT (heavy); GATE ST 'Testing of Hypotheses' (heavy); IIT JAM MS (heavy); UPSC ISS Statistics I-II (heavy)
ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF Agricultural Statistics (Units 1 and 2)
Neyman-Pearson lemma, UMP and likelihood-ratio tests, the standard tests, and Wald's SPRT with OC and ASN functions; numerical boundaries and statements of conditions.
How our questions for ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF spread across the units of Statistical Inference II: Testing of Hypotheses & Sequential Analysis. Difficulty: 8 easy, 18 medium, 18 hard.
| Sequential probability ratio test: OC and ASN functions | 10 | |
| Unbiased tests and UMPU tests for exponential families | 7 | |
| Monotone likelihood ratio and uniformly most powerful tests | 6 | |
| Wald and score (Rao) tests | 5 | |
| Relation between tests and confidence intervals | 5 | |
| Likelihood ratio tests and Wilks' theorem | 3 | |
| Hypotheses, the two types of error, size and power | 2 | |
| Neyman-Pearson lemma and most powerful tests | 2 | |
| Multiple testing: family-wise error rate and false discovery rate | 2 | |
| Tests based on Z, t, chi-square and F distributions | 1 | |
| Power and sample-size calculation for common tests | 1 |
Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.
Plot yields are N(μ, 16). From 16 plots, H₀: μ = 50 is rejected in favour of H₁: μ = 52 when x̄ > 51.645. What is the power of the test?
A. 0.639
SE = 4/√16 = 1. Power = P(X̄ > 51.645 | μ = 52) = P(Z > −0.355) = 0.639. 0.050 is the size; 0.361 is β; using σ = 4 instead of the standard error gives 0.535.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
For H₀: p = 0.5 against H₁: p = 0.8 with 10 Bernoulli trials, the MP test rejects for large X. P(X ≥ 9 | H₀) = 11/1024 and P(X = 8 | H₀) = 45/1024. For an exact size of 0.05, with what probability should H₀ be rejected when X = 8?
B. 0.893
Size = P(X ≥ 9) + γP(X = 8) = 0.05 gives γ = (0.05 − 11/1024)/(45/1024) = 0.893. Dividing 0.05 by P(X = 8) alone ignores the rejections already made at X ≥ 9.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Under a monotone likelihood ratio in T, what does the Karlin-Rubin theorem give for H₀: θ ≤ θ₀ against H₁: θ > θ₀?
D. A UMP level-α test that rejects for large T
Karlin-Rubin: rejecting when T > c with P_θ₀(T > c) = α is UMP for the one-sided problem, and its power function is non-decreasing in θ.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Why is there no UMP test of a one-sided hypothesis about the location θ of a Cauchy distribution based on one observation?
C. The likelihood ratio f(x; θ₁)/f(x; θ₀) is not monotone in x, so the MP region depends on θ₁
f(x; θ₁)/f(x; θ₀) rises and then falls back to 1 as x → ±∞, so the MP region against θ₁ is a bounded interval whose location depends on θ₁; no single region is best for all θ₁ > θ₀. Tests do exist; the support is the whole line; information is positive.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
In what sense is Fisher's exact test for a 2 × 2 table optimal?
B. Its randomised version is UMPU for the odds ratio, by conditioning on the margins
The margins are sufficient for the nuisance parameters; conditioning on them gives a hypergeometric null distribution, and the randomised conditional test is UMPU. The non-randomised version is conservative.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
The generalised likelihood-ratio statistic for H₀: θ ∈ Θ₀ is Λ = sup_Θ₀ L(θ)/sup_Θ L(θ). When is H₀ rejected?
C. When Λ is small, i.e. when −2 log Λ is large
Λ lies in [0, 1]; values near 1 mean the restricted model fits nearly as well as the full one, small values mean H₀ fits poorly. Λ cannot exceed 1 because the full maximum is at least the restricted one.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Which drawback is specific to the Wald test among the three asymptotic likelihood tests?
D. It is not invariant to reparameterisation of θ
Testing θ = 1 and log θ = 0 by Wald can give different statistics, because the standard error is computed on the chosen scale. The LRT is invariant; all three are asymptotically χ² under H₀ and all extend to several parameters.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
In Wald's SPRT with boundaries B < 1 < A on the likelihood ratio Λₙ = L₁/L₀, what is the rule after n observations?
C. Accept H₀ if Λₙ ≤ B, reject H₀ if Λₙ ≥ A, otherwise take another observation
Λₙ large favours H₁ (reject H₀); small favours H₀. Sampling continues while the ratio stays between the boundaries.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Where is the average sample number (ASN) of an SPRT largest?
D. At parameter values between θ₀ and θ₁, where evidence accumulates slowly
Between the two hypotheses E_θ(Z) is near zero, so the random walk drifts slowly and takes longest to hit a boundary. Far from both values decisions are quick.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
For the SPRT of μ₀ = 0 against μ₁ = 1 with N(μ, 1) data, α = 0.05 and β = 0.10, E₀(Z) = −1/2. Using Wald's approximation, what is the average sample number under H₀?
A. 3.99
E₀(N) ≈ [(1 − α)log B + α log A]/E₀(Z) = [0.95(−2.251) + 0.05(2.890)]/(−0.5) = 3.99. The fixed-sample one-sided test with the same α and β needs (1.645 + 1.282)² = 8.56, i.e. 9 observations; 4.50 ignores the chance of rejecting.
Further reading: Lehmann and Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses; Casella and Berger, Statistical Inference; Rohatgi and Saleh, An Introduction to Probability and Statistics
Ten here, 44 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.
Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.
An AI operating system for agriculture: free guides, manuals and tools written for every country.