LAISHA
Open Laisha

Wageningen MSc Management, Economics & Consumer Studies Agri Value Chain Management: practice questions

Wageningen MSc Management, Economics & Consumer Studies · Netherlands · Wageningen University & Research

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
9worked here, free
27written to this exam in this subject
11syllabus units

What this subject covers

Seeing the whole chain of actors that add value to a food product, what drives it, who governs it and how producers can upgrade within it.

In the exams: agribusiness management PhD entrance and fellowship examinations (present)

Where the 27 questions fall

How our questions for Wageningen MSc Management, Economics & Consumer Studies spread across the units of Agri Value Chain Management. Difficulty: 1 easy, 13 medium, 13 hard.

Value-chain actors4
Global food systems3
External drivers: globalisation and trade3
External drivers: climate and technology3
The role of the consumer3
Upgrading in value chains3
External drivers: population and income2
Agri-food market dynamics2
Value-chain governance2
Value-chain thinking compared with supply-chain thinking1
Value-chain mapping1

9 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · External drivers: population and income · medium

Which consequence of rapid urbanisation matters most for the design of food value chains?

  1. Urban consumers buy nearly all their food, more of it processed, so longer chains move more perishables further
  2. Urban consumers grow most of their own vegetables
  3. Urbanisation reduces total food demand
  4. Urban consumers buy only from supermarkets, so traditional wet markets and street vendors disappear from the cities
Answer and working

A. Urban consumers buy nearly all their food, more of it processed, so longer chains move more perishables further

City dwellers depend on purchased food, raising demand for aggregation, storage, transport and processing at scale. Urban consumers in many countries still buy heavily from traditional markets and small shops, so 'only supermarkets' is wrong.

2 · External drivers: globalisation and trade · hard

A country abolishes the state marketing board that bought all cotton at a fixed price and supplied seed and fertiliser on credit. Private ginners enter. Which outcome is most consistent with experience from such reforms?

  1. Farmers' incomes necessarily fall because private firms always pay less
  2. Quality automatically improves because competition can reward it
  3. Farmers' share of the export price may rise, but input credit and quality control can collapse without private coordination
  4. Nothing changes for farmers, because boards and private ginners perform identical roles in buying, input credit and quality control
Answer and working

C. Farmers' share of the export price may rise, but input credit and quality control can collapse without private coordination

Liberalisation of export-crop boards often raised producer price shares but removed input credit and quality systems; side-selling among competing ginners made input credit hard to recover, and in some chains quality fell until private coordination emerged. Neither universal decline nor automatic improvement is supported.

3 · Value-chain actors · hard

In a district, women manage 40 percent of the maize area with average yields of 1.5 t/ha, while men's plots yield 2.0 t/ha. If better access to inputs and advice raised women's yields to equal men's, by how much would total district maize output rise?

  1. 25.0%
  2. 11.1%
  3. 10.0%
  4. 33.3%
Answer and working

B. 11.1%

Per 100 ha: current output = 60 × 2.0 + 40 × 1.5 = 180 t; after closing the gap = 100 × 2.0 = 200 t. Increase = 20/180 = 11.1%. 25% is the yield gap relative to men's yield; 10% multiplies 40% by 25% but ignores that the base output is below 200 t; 33.3% is the rise on women's plots only.

4 · Value-chain actors · hard

A leafy vegetable that women grew and sold in local markets becomes a contract export crop, with contracts and payments registered in the name of the landholder, usually the husband. What is the most likely risk, and a sound response?

  1. Women's incomes rise automatically because the crop is more profitable, and contracts guarantee them a fixed share of the payment
  2. Income control shifts to men while women's labour rises; registering both spouses and paying the worker can counter it
  3. Men usually withdraw from the crop because exports are risky
  4. The processor must stop buying from women by law
Answer and working

B. Income control shifts to men while women's labour rises; registering both spouses and paying the worker can counter it

Gender-sensitive analysis maps who works, who owns and who is paid. Commercialisation often moves control of a crop to men when contracts follow land title. Joint registration and paying the worker are standard responses; higher profitability does not guarantee women benefit.

5 · Value-chain mapping · hard

In a coffee chain, 6 kg of fresh cherry yields 1 kg of green coffee. Farmers sell cherry at 0.8 CU per kg, and exporters sell green coffee free on board at 9 CU per kg. What is the farmers' share of the FOB value?

  1. 8.9%
  2. 46.7%
  3. 53.3%
  4. 1.5%
Answer and working

C. 53.3%

Put both on a green-coffee basis: 1 kg green needs 6 kg cherry costing 6 × 0.8 = 4.8 CU. Share = 4.8/9 = 53.3%. Dividing prices per kg directly (0.8/9 = 8.9%) compares a kilo of cherry with a kilo of green coffee, the most common basis error; 46.7% is the post-farm share; dividing by the ratio instead of multiplying gives 1.5%.

6 · The role of the consumer · hard

A vegetable grower considers converting to certified organic production. Conventionally she harvests 1000 kg at 2.0 CU per kg. After conversion she expects 850 kg, all sold at 2.6 CU per kg, input cost savings of 150 CU and certification costs of 120 CU. What is the change in her net return?

  1. +240 CU
  2. +630 CU
  3. +210 CU
  4. −390 CU
Answer and working

A. +240 CU

Revenue change = 850 × 2.6 − 1000 × 2.0 = 2210 − 2000 = 210; add savings 150 and subtract certification 120: net change = +240 CU. Assuming yield stays at 1000 kg gives +630; +210 ignores cost changes; −390 counts only the lost volume.

7 · The role of the consumer · medium

A retail price premium of 30 percent for a certified product does not mean farmers receive 30 percent more. Why?

  1. Because certification premiums are illegal at farm level
  2. Because consumers pay the premium only in the first year, after which retailers fold it into the ordinary shelf price for all
  3. The premium is shared along the chain and absorbs certification and marketing costs, and not all output sells as certified
  4. Because farmers are paid in a different currency
Answer and working

C. The premium is shared along the chain and absorbs certification and marketing costs, and not all output sells as certified

The retail premium, farm-gate premium and farmer's net gain are different quantities. Studies across coffee, cocoa, tea and bananas find mixed net income effects for farmers for exactly these reasons.

8 · Upgrading in value chains · hard

A cooperative introduces a costly quality standard to win a premium export contract. Which outcome should an inclusive upgrading strategy most guard against?

  1. All members earning the same premium
  2. Poorer members who cannot afford the investment being excluded while better-off members take the premium
  3. The cooperative becoming too small to need certification once the premium export contract is signed with the buyer
  4. Consumers refusing to pay for quality
Answer and working

B. Poorer members who cannot afford the investment being excluded while better-off members take the premium

Upgrading is not automatically inclusive; raised standards can exclude those unable to invest. Finance, group investment and attention to who controls new assets and income are standard remedies.

9 · External drivers: climate and technology · medium

Which statement about climate impacts on agri-food value chains is most accurate?

  1. Impacts reach beyond the farm to roads, storage, processing and quality, so the whole chain must plan for them
  2. Climate affects only the farm stage
  3. Climate affects only consumers through prices, since farms adapt by switching crops and traders simply pass costs on
  4. Climate change affects only irrigated agriculture
Answer and working

A. Impacts reach beyond the farm to roads, storage, processing and quality, so the whole chain must plan for them

Heat and floods damage infrastructure and plants, shifting harvest timing disrupts processors and exporters, and quality changes affect premiums. A chain-wide view of risk is therefore needed.

Ten here, 27 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to Wageningen MSc Management, Economics & Consumer Studies in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Agri Value Chain ManagementThe full study manual, free Wageningen MSc Management, Economics & Consumer StudiesFormat, sections and how it has changed

More Wageningen MSc Management, Economics & Consumer Studies practice

Economic Development and Agricultural Economies of the WorldFood Retail & Agri-food Retail ManagementInstitutional Economics

Agri Value Chain Management for other exams

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF · IndiaICAR AIEEA-PG · IndiaState agricultural university MBA admission · IndiaEgerton University · KenyaHarper Adams MSc International Agri-Business · UK

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.