LAISHA
Open Laisha

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF Carbon Markets, Offsets & Payments for Ecosystem Services: practice questions

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF (PhD) — Environmental Sciences (subject 71) and Agricultural Meteorology (subject 60) · India · National Testing Agency for ICAR

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
17written to this exam in this subject
10syllabus units

What this subject covers

How carbon is priced and traded and what makes a credit credible: compliance emission trading schemes, Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, voluntary markets, agricultural and land-based project methods, and integrity issues. The economic theory of emissions trading versus taxes is in the Agribusiness subject natural-resource-environmental-economics; this subject covers market design, project methods and integrity in detail.

In the exams: ICAR AICE subject 71 Unit 3 (CDM, carbon credit); GARP SCR 'Green and Sustainable Finance'; UPSC CSE GS-III; carbon project developer and verifier roles

What ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF asks from it

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF (PhD) -- Environmental Sciences (subject 71, Unit 3)

Carbon sequestration and the CDM: the Kyoto mechanisms and their units, the CDM project cycle and actors (DNA, DOE, Executive Board), carbon credits from agriculture and forestry, REDD+ basics, and simple credit arithmetic.

Where the 17 questions fall

How our questions for ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF spread across the units of Carbon Markets, Offsets & Payments for Ecosystem Services. Difficulty: 2 easy, 13 medium, 2 hard.

From the Kyoto mechanisms (CDM, JI) to Paris Article 6.2 and 6.45
REDD+ and nature-based credits (forest detail in the Forestry track)2
Corresponding adjustments and double counting2
Payments for ecosystem services and biodiversity credits2
Carbon pricing instruments: taxes and emission trading schemes1
Major compliance markets and their design features1
Credit integrity: additionality, baselines, leakage, permanence1
Avoidance versus removal credits1
Agricultural and soil carbon project methods1
Benefit sharing and smallholder participation1

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Carbon pricing instruments: taxes and emission trading schemes · hard

Why are agricultural methane and nitrous oxide rarely covered by explicit carbon prices?

  1. Emissions are diffuse across many small sources and hard to measure on each farm, with sensitive politics
  2. The IPCC Guidelines exclude agricultural methane and nitrous oxide from national inventories altogether
  3. Agricultural gases have a global warming potential below that of CO2, so pricing them would raise very little
  4. Carbon prices can legally apply only to fuel combustion under the Paris Agreement and Kyoto Protocol
Answer and working

A. Emissions are diffuse across many small sources and hard to measure on each farm, with sensitive politics

Diffuse sources, costly farm-level measurement, food-price and competitiveness concerns make pricing hard; Denmark's livestock tax agreed in 2024 is the first explicit attempt. Agricultural gases are in inventories, have GWPs far above CO2, and no treaty limits pricing to combustion.

2 · From the Kyoto mechanisms (CDM, JI) to Paris Article 6.2 and 6.4 · easy

A CDM project is issued 50,000 CERs. Under the CDM share of proceeds for adaptation (2% of CERs issued), how many CERs go to the Adaptation Fund?

  1. 1,000
  2. 3,500
  3. 2,500
  4. 100
Answer and working

A. 1,000

2% x 50,000 = 1,000. 2,500 applies the Article 6.4 share of proceeds (5%), 3,500 the Article 6.4 share plus OMGE, and 100 is a decimal slip.

3 · From the Kyoto mechanisms (CDM, JI) to Paris Article 6.2 and 6.4 · medium

Which crediting problem were the CDM's temporary credits (tCERs and lCERs) designed to address?

  1. Non-permanence of carbon stored in afforestation and reforestation projects
  2. Late payment of the share of proceeds by small-scale projects in least developed countries
  3. Double issuance of credits by two different registries for one renewable project
  4. Leakage of emissions from industrial gas destruction projects to other countries
Answer and working

A. Non-permanence of carbon stored in afforestation and reforestation projects

Forest carbon can be lost, so A/R CERs expired and had to be replaced. They were not a tool for double issuance, leakage or share-of-proceeds collection.

4 · Credit integrity: additionality, baselines, leakage, permanence · medium

A forest-protection project stops logging in one area, and the logging company moves its crews to an unprotected forest nearby. This is an example of:

  1. A permanence reversal of credited carbon
  2. Activity-shifting leakage
  3. Double issuance
  4. Market leakage
Answer and working

B. Activity-shifting leakage

The agents of deforestation moved: activity-shifting leakage. Market leakage works through prices (less timber, higher prices, more logging elsewhere by others); a reversal is loss of carbon already credited; double issuance is a registry problem.

5 · Agricultural and soil carbon project methods · medium

What is the 'measure-model-remeasure' approach in soil-carbon crediting?

  1. A calibrated model estimates SOC change between periodic soil-sampling rounds that true up the estimates
  2. Every field is sampled every year and models are not used at all, to avoid any modelling uncertainty
  3. Remote sensing replaces both soil sampling and models, measuring soil carbon directly from satellites
  4. Soil is measured once at the start, then modelled for the rest of the project with no further sampling
Answer and working

A. A calibrated model estimates SOC change between periodic soil-sampling rounds that true up the estimates

Hybrid approaches combine models for interim estimates with periodic re-measurement. One-off measurement, annual census sampling and satellite-only measurement are not this approach.

6 · REDD+ and nature-based credits (forest detail in the Forestry track) · medium

A jurisdiction's forest reference emission level assumes 1,000 ha/yr of deforestation; monitored deforestation is 600 ha/yr. The emission factor is 500 t CO2 per ha cleared. What emission reduction is reported for the year?

  1. 200,000 t CO2
  2. 500,000 t CO2
  3. 54,545 t CO2
  4. 300,000 t CO2
Answer and working

A. 200,000 t CO2

(1,000 - 600) x 500 = 200,000 t CO2. 500,000 is the reference emissions; 300,000 are actual emissions; 54,545 converts CO2 to carbon by mistake.

7 · Corresponding adjustments and double counting · medium

Why does Article 6.4 cancel at least 2% of issued A6.4ERs for 'overall mitigation in global emissions' (OMGE)?

  1. So that buyers receive a discount of 2% on each credit they purchase from developing countries
  2. So that host countries receive them free to meet their own NDC targets before any exports occur
  3. So that the Supervisory Body can sell them to raise the funds it needs for the administration of the mechanism
  4. So that part of each transaction benefits the atmosphere instead of offsetting any party's emissions
Answer and working

D. So that part of each transaction benefits the atmosphere instead of offsetting any party's emissions

OMGE cancellation means the units are retired for no one's use, delivering a net global benefit. The separate 5% share of proceeds funds adaptation; neither is a sale, a host-country allocation or a buyer discount.

8 · Benefit sharing and smallholder participation · medium

Why may carbon payments routed only to registered landholders fail gender-equity goals?

  1. In many farming systems women manage land without holding title, so title-based payments bypass them
  2. Gender has no relevance to carbon payments, because all payments go to national governments first
  3. Registered landholders are always women in smallholder systems, so men are excluded from payments
  4. Women are generally barred from all carbon contracts under the Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol
Answer and working

A. In many farming systems women manage land without holding title, so title-based payments bypass them

Customary and informal land management by women is common, and payments tied to title can exclude them. The other options are false.

9 · Payments for ecosystem services and biodiversity credits · medium

What is the correct order of the mitigation hierarchy that precedes any biodiversity offset?

  1. Minimise, offset, avoid, then restore residual impacts
  2. Restore, avoid, offset, then minimise residual impacts
  3. Offset, restore, minimise, then avoid residual impacts
  4. Avoid, minimise, restore, then offset residual impacts
Answer and working

D. Avoid, minimise, restore, then offset residual impacts

Offsets are a last resort for residual impacts after avoidance, minimisation and restoration.

10 · Payments for ecosystem services and biodiversity credits · medium

China's Sloping Land Conversion Programme, often called 'Grain for Green', paid farmers to:

  1. Expand rice paddies onto hillsides to raise grain output
  2. Sell carbon credits from soil carbon on irrigated plains
  3. Retire steep cropland and convert it to forest or grassland
  4. Plant oil palm on converted natural forest and peatland
Answer and working

C. Retire steep cropland and convert it to forest or grassland

The programme, launched in 1999, compensated farmers with grain and cash for converting sloping cropland to trees or grass, mainly to reduce erosion and flooding. It is among the largest PES-like programmes in the world.

Ten here, 17 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Carbon Markets, Offsets & Payments for Ecosystem ServicesThe full study manual, free ICAR AICE-JRF/SRFFormat, sections and how it has changed

More ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF practice

Agrobiodiversity & Genetic ResourcesAtmospheric Science & AgrometeorologyWetlands, Coastal Ecosystems & Blue CarbonEnvironmental & Agro-ecosystem ModellingBiodiversity Science & ConservationClimate Change Impacts on Agriculture & Food SystemsEnvironmental Monitoring & Instrumental AnalysisClimate Adaptation, Climate-Smart Agriculture & Disaster RiskEcosystem Services & Pollinators in Agricultural LandscapesRemote Sensing & GIS for Environmental MonitoringResearch Methods in Environmental & Sustainability ScienceEnergy, Environment & Agri-energy TransitionsLandscape Ecology, Protected Areas & Human-Wildlife InteractionsPesticides in the Environment: Fate, Risk & ReductionClimate Models, Scenarios & DownscalingAgroforestry & Trees on Farms for SustainabilityEcology & Ecosystem ScienceSoil Contamination, Toxicology & RemediationAgroecology: Principles & PracticePrinciples of Environmental ScienceSoil Science & Soil HealthLand Degradation, Desertification & Soil ConservationHydrology & Water Resources for Environmental ScientistsSoil Organic Carbon & Carbon Sequestration

Carbon Markets, Offsets & Payments for Ecosystem Services for other exams

GARP Sustainability and Climate Risk Certificate · International

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.