CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE · United Kingdom · Institution of Agricultural Engineers (licensed by the Engineering Council)
Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papersCEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE is a professional certification run by Institution of Agricultural Engineers (licensed by the Engineering Council), for candidates in United Kingdom. Competence review and professional review interview against UK-SPEC. No written exam.
Source: iagre.org.
Checked against the exam body's published information. Formats and fees change; confirm the current edition there before you book.
How the profession is regulated and what an engineer owes the public, the client and colleagues.
Our 15 CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE questions in this subject: 4 easy, 6 medium, 5 hard, across 3 units.
Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.
These 10 were written to CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE and are not shown on any other exam's page.
In the Challenger shuttle disaster of 1986, what is the central lesson about engineering judgement that ethics courses draw from the launch decision?
B. The burden of proof was reversed: engineers were asked to prove the launch was unsafe
The booster contractor's engineers had identified the risk of O-ring failure at low temperature and recommended against launch. Under schedule pressure the decision was reversed because the data did not conclusively prove failure. The lesson is that for safety-critical decisions the burden should be on showing safety, and engineers' warnings must reach and change decisions.
The Citicorp Center case of 1978 is usually taught as an example of which kind of professional conduct?
C. An engineer reporting his own design weakness and having it fixed before any failure
William LeMessurier found that his completed building was more vulnerable to quartering winds than intended, partly because welded connections had been changed to bolted ones. He told the owner and authorities and the connections were reinforced. It is the standard positive example of putting public safety ahead of self-interest.
When an engineer's safety concern is ignored inside the organisation and a serious danger to the public remains, the codes of ethics require the engineer to:
C. Notify the appropriate external authority as a last resort
Whistleblowing is a last resort after internal routes fail, and it is a duty when public safety is at serious risk. The appropriate authority, such as a regulator or licensing board, is the proper recipient; going first to the media is not the recommended route.
Using line-drawing to judge a gift, where would an all-expenses-paid trip from a bidder whose tender the engineer is evaluating fall, compared with a desk calendar from a regular supplier?
D. Near the negative paradigm, while the calendar falls near the positive paradigm
Line-drawing places a case between a clearly acceptable positive paradigm and a clearly wrong negative paradigm by comparing features: value, timing, the giver's interest in a pending decision and secrecy. A valuable trip from a bidder during evaluation shares the features of a bribe; a trivial calendar does not.
Which value is named explicitly in Engineers Australia's code of ethics and in many recent engineering codes, alongside integrity and competence?
C. Promoting sustainability
Engineers Australia's code asks members to demonstrate integrity, practise competently, exercise leadership and promote sustainability. Many codes now include duties to the environment and sustainable development; shareholder returns and political loyalty are not professional duties in these codes.
What does the Washington Accord provide?
C. Mutual recognition of accredited professional engineering degree programmes
The Washington Accord, signed in 1989 and administered by the International Engineering Alliance, recognises the substantial equivalence of accredited engineering degrees. It is not a licence. The Dublin Accord covers technician programmes and the Sydney Accord technologist programmes.
In Canada, who regulates the practice of engineering and grants the P.Eng. designation?
D. The engineering regulator of each province or territory
Engineering is regulated provincially and territorially; each regulator licenses engineers in its jurisdiction. Engineers Canada is the national federation of the regulators and accredits programmes through the CEAB, but does not license individuals.
Which Australian state has required registration of professional engineers by statute since 1929?
C. Queensland
Queensland's registration of professional engineers dates from 1929 (RPEQ). Victoria and New South Wales introduced statutory schemes much more recently. Engineers Australia's Chartered status (CPEng) is a separate, national professional credential.
Which statement best describes the regulation of engineers in India?
D. No general national licensing law exists; NBA accredits degrees and IEI awards CEng
India has no statute that licenses engineers to practise generally. The National Board of Accreditation accredits programmes and has been a full signatory of the Washington Accord since 2014. The Institution of Engineers (India) offers membership and the Chartered Engineer title; some specific work needs local qualifications or empanelment.
Which three elements underlie engineering registration in nearly every country?
B. Accredited education, supervised experience and an assessment of competence
Whatever the system, registration rests on education, experience and an assessment by examination, interview or portfolio, with continuing professional development to stay registered.
This plan follows where our questions actually fall, so the time goes where the marks are likely to be. It is our reading of the syllabus, not the exam body's weighting.
Read the manual chapters for these first and do every worked question you can find on them.
Aim for one sitting per unit, then mixed questions across them.
Learn the definitions, classifications and standard numbers; these units are more often recalled than worked.
Come back to these after a first pass, untimed, and read every explanation, including for the options you rejected.
Do these early in revision so they are fast on the day.
Last updated · How Laisha writes and checks its pages · Report a mistake
US$10 a month · one price worldwide · cancel any time
| Free | Smarter | |
|---|---|---|
| Grow guides, pest pages, articles | Read all | Read all |
| Ask Laisha | 5 a day | Up to 1,000 a month |
| Exam practice | The sample on each page | Every question, timed papers |
| Crop calendar and pest alerts | — | For your own fields |
| Calculators and tools | — | All |
| Uploads and reports | — | 100 a month, real files |
An AI operating system for agriculture: free guides, manuals and tools written for every country.