LAISHA
Open Laisha

CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE Professional Practice, Ethics & Laws: practice questions

CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE · United Kingdom · Institution of Agricultural Engineers (licensed by the Engineering Council)

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
15written to this exam in this subject
3syllabus units

About CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE

CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE is a professional certification run by Institution of Agricultural Engineers (licensed by the Engineering Council), for candidates in United Kingdom. Competence review and professional review interview against UK-SPEC. No written exam.

Source: iagre.org.

Checked against the exam body's published information. Formats and fees change; confirm the current edition there before you book.

Professional Practice, Ethics & Laws in CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE

How the profession is regulated and what an engineer owes the public, the client and colleagues.

Our 15 CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE questions in this subject: 4 easy, 6 medium, 5 hard, across 3 units.

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

These 10 were written to CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE and are not shown on any other exam's page.

Question 1 · hard

In the Challenger shuttle disaster of 1986, what is the central lesson about engineering judgement that ethics courses draw from the launch decision?

  1. The engineers had failed to identify the O-ring problem before the night of the launch
  2. The burden of proof was reversed: engineers were asked to prove the launch was unsafe
  3. The managers lacked any technical training and could not understand the data presented
  4. The disaster was caused by a calculation error in the design of the external fuel tank
Answer and working

B. The burden of proof was reversed: engineers were asked to prove the launch was unsafe

The booster contractor's engineers had identified the risk of O-ring failure at low temperature and recommended against launch. Under schedule pressure the decision was reversed because the data did not conclusively prove failure. The lesson is that for safety-critical decisions the burden should be on showing safety, and engineers' warnings must reach and change decisions.

Question 2 · medium

The Citicorp Center case of 1978 is usually taught as an example of which kind of professional conduct?

  1. An engineer hiding a design weakness to protect his reputation until it was too late
  2. A contractor substituting cheaper materials without the engineer's knowledge
  3. An engineer reporting his own design weakness and having it fixed before any failure
  4. A licensing board revoking a licence for sealing drawings not prepared by the engineer
Answer and working

C. An engineer reporting his own design weakness and having it fixed before any failure

William LeMessurier found that his completed building was more vulnerable to quartering winds than intended, partly because welded connections had been changed to bolted ones. He told the owner and authorities and the connections were reinforced. It is the standard positive example of putting public safety ahead of self-interest.

Question 3 · easy

When an engineer's safety concern is ignored inside the organisation and a serious danger to the public remains, the codes of ethics require the engineer to:

  1. Accept the decision, since the employer carries legal responsibility
  2. Seek a transfer to another project and say no more about the issue
  3. Notify the appropriate external authority as a last resort
  4. Inform the media first, since the public has a right to know
Answer and working

C. Notify the appropriate external authority as a last resort

Whistleblowing is a last resort after internal routes fail, and it is a duty when public safety is at serious risk. The appropriate authority, such as a regulator or licensing board, is the proper recipient; going first to the media is not the recommended route.

Question 4 · hard

Using line-drawing to judge a gift, where would an all-expenses-paid trip from a bidder whose tender the engineer is evaluating fall, compared with a desk calendar from a regular supplier?

  1. Near the positive paradigm, since such trips build useful long-term business relationships
  2. At the same point as the calendar, since both are gifts from suppliers
  3. Outside the method, which applies only to safety and not to gifts
  4. Near the negative paradigm, while the calendar falls near the positive paradigm
Answer and working

D. Near the negative paradigm, while the calendar falls near the positive paradigm

Line-drawing places a case between a clearly acceptable positive paradigm and a clearly wrong negative paradigm by comparing features: value, timing, the giver's interest in a pending decision and secrecy. A valuable trip from a bidder during evaluation shares the features of a bribe; a trivial calendar does not.

Question 5 · medium

Which value is named explicitly in Engineers Australia's code of ethics and in many recent engineering codes, alongside integrity and competence?

  1. Maximising shareholder returns
  2. Political neutrality in all matters
  3. Promoting sustainability
  4. Loyalty to the national government
Answer and working

C. Promoting sustainability

Engineers Australia's code asks members to demonstrate integrity, practise competently, exercise leadership and promote sustainability. Many codes now include duties to the environment and sustainable development; shareholder returns and political loyalty are not professional duties in these codes.

Question 6 · easy

What does the Washington Accord provide?

  1. A single international engineering licence valid in every signatory country
  2. A common code of ethics that replaces the national codes of the signatories
  3. Mutual recognition of accredited professional engineering degree programmes
  4. Recognition of engineering technician diplomas awarded in signatory countries
Answer and working

C. Mutual recognition of accredited professional engineering degree programmes

The Washington Accord, signed in 1989 and administered by the International Engineering Alliance, recognises the substantial equivalence of accredited engineering degrees. It is not a licence. The Dublin Accord covers technician programmes and the Sydney Accord technologist programmes.

Question 7 · medium

In Canada, who regulates the practice of engineering and grants the P.Eng. designation?

  1. A single federal engineering council in Ottawa
  2. Engineers Canada, which issues national licences
  3. The universities that award accredited degrees
  4. The engineering regulator of each province or territory
Answer and working

D. The engineering regulator of each province or territory

Engineering is regulated provincially and territorially; each regulator licenses engineers in its jurisdiction. Engineers Canada is the national federation of the regulators and accredits programmes through the CEAB, but does not license individuals.

Question 8 · medium

Which Australian state has required registration of professional engineers by statute since 1929?

  1. Tasmania
  2. Western Australia
  3. Queensland
  4. South Australia
Answer and working

C. Queensland

Queensland's registration of professional engineers dates from 1929 (RPEQ). Victoria and New South Wales introduced statutory schemes much more recently. Engineers Australia's Chartered status (CPEng) is a separate, national professional credential.

Question 9 · hard

Which statement best describes the regulation of engineers in India?

  1. All engineers must pass a national licensing exam set by the Bureau of Indian Standards
  2. Engineers are licensed by each state's public works department after a written test
  3. The Institution of Engineers (India) issues licences required for all design work
  4. No general national licensing law exists; NBA accredits degrees and IEI awards CEng
Answer and working

D. No general national licensing law exists; NBA accredits degrees and IEI awards CEng

India has no statute that licenses engineers to practise generally. The National Board of Accreditation accredits programmes and has been a full signatory of the Washington Accord since 2014. The Institution of Engineers (India) offers membership and the Chartered Engineer title; some specific work needs local qualifications or empanelment.

Question 10 · easy

Which three elements underlie engineering registration in nearly every country?

  1. Citizenship, membership of a trade union and a fixed number of years of age
  2. Accredited education, supervised experience and an assessment of competence
  3. A doctoral degree, published research and a recommendation from a minister
  4. An apprenticeship, a written trade test and payment of an annual levy only
Answer and working

B. Accredited education, supervised experience and an assessment of competence

Whatever the system, registration rests on education, experience and an assessment by examination, interview or portfolio, with continuing professional development to stay registered.

A study plan for Professional Practice, Ethics & Laws in CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE

This plan follows where our questions actually fall, so the time goes where the marks are likely to be. It is our reading of the syllabus, not the exam body's weighting.

  1. First, the heavy units (47% of the 15 questions): Codes of ethics for engineers (7, 47%).

    Read the manual chapters for these first and do every worked question you can find on them.

  2. Then the middle band: Registration routes in other countries (7, 47%).

    Aim for one sitting per unit, then mixed questions across them.

  3. Then the lighter units: Safety and liability (1, 7%).

    Learn the definitions, classifications and standard numbers; these units are more often recalled than worked.

  4. Leave time for the hard ones: Safety and liability (1 hard of 1), Codes of ethics for engineers (3 hard of 7), Registration routes in other countries (1 hard of 7).

    Come back to these after a first pass, untimed, and read every explanation, including for the options you rejected.

  5. Bank the easy marks: Registration routes in other countries (3 easy of 7); Codes of ethics for engineers (1 easy of 7).

    Do these early in revision so they are fast on the day.

  6. Finish timed. Sit the subject as a timed set without notes, mark it, and send each wrong answer back to its unit above.

Last updated · How Laisha writes and checks its pages · Report a mistake

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.

Unlock every question — CEng / IEng / EngTech via IAgrE Professional Practice, Ethics & Laws

US$10 a month · one price worldwide · cancel any time

  • Every practice question in this subject, with full working
  • Timed exam papers and progress by unit
  • Ask Laisha to explain any answer — up to 1,000 questions a month
Free or Smarter
FreeSmarter
Grow guides, pest pages, articlesRead allRead all
Ask Laisha5 a dayUp to 1,000 a month
Exam practiceThe sample on each pageEvery question, timed papers
Crop calendar and pest alerts—For your own fields
Calculators and tools—All
Uploads and reports—100 a month, real files
10 days free for every new account, no card.