LAISHA
Open Laisha

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF Institutional Economics: practice questions

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF (PhD admission and fellowship) · India · National Testing Agency for ICAR

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
64written to this exam in this subject
8syllabus units

What this subject covers

Why institutions and transaction costs matter for how agricultural resources are used, and how agrarian institutions such as tenancy work.

In the exams: agricultural economics PhD entrance and fellowship examinations (light)

What ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF asks from it

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF (PhD) Agricultural Economics

Light weight. Author-idea matching (Veblen, Commons, Coase, Williamson, North, Olson, Ostrom, Demsetz, Cheung, Stiglitz, Bhaduri, Hayami-Ruttan); definitions of institutions, organisations and transaction costs; the Coase theorem; asset specificity and governance forms; property regimes and the tragedy of the commons; Marshallian inefficiency of sharecropping; interlinked markets and semi-feudalism.

Where the 64 questions fall

How our questions for ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF spread across the units of Institutional Economics. Difficulty: 28 easy, 31 medium, 5 hard.

Institutions and institutional economics11
Transaction costs10
Tenancy and sharecropping9
Institutional change8
Collective action and the group approach8
Property rights8
Interlinked agrarian markets6
Institutions and resource allocation4

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Institutions and institutional economics · easy

The term 'new institutional economics' was coined by

  1. John R. Commons
  2. Wesley Clair Mitchell
  3. Oliver Williamson
  4. Thorstein Veblen
Answer and working

C. Oliver Williamson

Williamson introduced the phrase in 1975 (Markets and Hierarchies) to distinguish the new, transaction-cost-based programme from the older American institutionalism of Commons, Veblen and Mitchell.

Further reading: Williamson 1975

2 · Institutional change · easy

The theory of induced institutional innovation, which holds that changes in relative factor prices and technology create a demand for new institutions, is associated with

  1. Vernon Ruttan and Yujiro Hayami
  2. Amit Bhaduri and Pranab Bardhan
  3. Steven Cheung and D. Gale Johnson
  4. Mancur Olson and Garrett Hardin
Answer and working

A. Vernon Ruttan and Yujiro Hayami

Ruttan and Hayami (1984) extended their induced technical innovation model to institutions. Olson and Hardin wrote on collective action and the commons; Bhaduri and Bardhan on agrarian relations and interlinkage; Cheung and Johnson on share tenancy.

Further reading: Ruttan and Hayami 1984

3 · Institutional change · medium

Which force is NOT emphasised by Hayami and Ruttan as a source of demand for institutional change?

  1. A random shift in voters' tastes unrelated to prices
  2. New technology that raises the return to securing rights in land
  3. Growth of markets that raises the value of output from a resource
  4. A change in the relative scarcity and hence the prices of land and labour
Answer and working

A. A random shift in voters' tastes unrelated to prices

In the induced institutional innovation model, demand for change comes from shifts in relative factor and product prices and from technical change, which alter the gains from new arrangements. A random taste shift unrelated to economic conditions is not part of their demand side (culture enters on the supply side).

Further reading: Ruttan and Hayami 1984

4 · Institutional change · easy

North's Nobel prize (1993) was shared with

  1. Oliver Williamson
  2. Robert Fogel
  3. Elinor Ostrom
  4. Ronald Coase
Answer and working

B. Robert Fogel

North and Fogel shared the 1993 prize for renewing economic history with economic theory and quantitative methods. Coase won in 1991; Ostrom and Williamson shared 2009.

Further reading: Nobel Prize records

5 · Collective action and the group approach · medium

In joint-liability group lending, Ghatak (1999) emphasised that safe borrowers choose to form groups with other safe borrowers. This mechanism is called

  1. peer monitoring, which reduces ex post moral hazard
  2. social collateral, which raises enforcement
  3. dynamic incentives, which reward repayment
  4. peer selection, cutting adverse selection
Answer and working

D. peer selection, cutting adverse selection

Ghatak's assortative matching (peer selection) addresses adverse selection. Peer monitoring of loan use was Stiglitz's (1990) emphasis; social collateral and peer pressure at repayment were Besley and Coate's (1995); dynamic incentives refer to promising larger future loans.

Further reading: Ghatak 1999; Stiglitz 1990; Besley and Coate 1995

6 · Property rights · easy

Hardin's 'tragedy of the commons' (1968) is, in the terminology of property regimes, more accurately a tragedy of

  1. state property
  2. open access
  3. common property
  4. private property
Answer and working

B. open access

Hardin's herders face no limits on entry or use — that is open access. Common property, in which a defined group holds rights and excludes outsiders, can be sustainable, as Ciriacy-Wantrup and Bishop and Ostrom stressed.

Further reading: Ciriacy-Wantrup and Bishop 1975; Ostrom 1990

7 · Property rights · medium

Secure land rights are expected to raise farm investment through three channels. Which of the following is NOT one of them?

  1. Gains from trade by renting or selling land to more productive users
  2. Use of the land as collateral to obtain credit for investment
  3. Lower output prices for the farmer's produce
  4. Assurance that the farmer will keep the returns from improvements
Answer and working

C. Lower output prices for the farmer's produce

The standard channels are assurance (security of returns), collateral (credit access) and gains from trade (transferability). Lower output prices are not a channel through which tenure security works.

Further reading: Besley 1995; Deininger, World Bank Land Policies

8 · Tenancy and sharecropping · hard

Output on a plot is Q = 40√L, the output price is 1 and labour's opportunity cost is 2 per unit. A sharecropper keeps half the output and bears all labour costs. How much labour does he apply, and how much would a fixed-rent tenant apply?

  1. 25 units as a sharecropper and 50 units as a fixed-rent tenant
  2. 100 units as a sharecropper and 400 units as a fixed-rent tenant
  3. 25 units as a sharecropper and 100 units as a fixed-rent tenant
  4. 50 units as a sharecropper and 100 units as a fixed-rent tenant
Answer and working

C. 25 units as a sharecropper and 100 units as a fixed-rent tenant

MP of labour = 20/√L. Fixed-rent tenant: 20/√L = 2, √L = 10, L = 100. Sharecropper: 0.5 × 20/√L = 2, √L = 5, L = 25. Halving the share cuts labour to a quarter here, not a half, because MP falls with √L; 400 is the fixed-rent output, not labour.

Further reading: Marshall; Ray, Development Economics

9 · Interlinked agrarian markets · medium

Braverman and Stiglitz (1982) showed that a landlord who also lends to his sharecropper

  1. can use the loan terms to influence the tenant's effort, partly offsetting the share contract's disincentive
  2. will always block technical change because it reduces the tenant's need to borrow
  3. cannot affect the tenant's behaviour, because credit and land markets are independent
  4. must charge the market interest rate, since any other rate would generally be illegal
Answer and working

A. can use the loan terms to influence the tenant's effort, partly offsetting the share contract's disincentive

In their model interlinkage lets the landlord design credit terms that raise the tenant's effort, so interlinkage can be an efficiency-enhancing response to moral hazard. The 'always block' claim is Bhaduri's view, which they argued does not generally hold; independence of markets is what interlinkage denies; legality is not the issue.

Further reading: Braverman and Stiglitz 1982

10 · Interlinked agrarian markets · medium

Aleem's (1990) study of informal moneylenders in Chambar, Pakistan, found that their high interest rates mainly reflected

  1. government interest-rate ceilings that forced lenders to charge above the ceiling
  2. high screening, collection and default costs rather than large monopoly profits
  3. large monopoly profits, since lenders faced no competition from other lenders
  4. the very low cost of lending, which attracted too many lenders to the market
Answer and working

B. high screening, collection and default costs rather than large monopoly profits

Aleem measured lenders' costs and found that high rates were close to average costs, which were high because of screening, chasing repayment and defaults; monopolistic competition rather than pure monopoly profit. Ceilings and low costs are inconsistent with the findings.

Further reading: Aleem 1990

Ten here, 64 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Institutional EconomicsThe full study manual, free ICAR AICE-JRF/SRFFormat, sections and how it has changed

More ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF practice

Marketing ManagementResearch MethodologyProduction & Operations ManagementEconometricsAgri Value Chain ManagementAgribusiness Environment & PolicyDevelopment EconomicsBusiness Analytics & Digital AgribusinessInternational Agri Trade & Export ManagementOperations Research / Quantitative TechniquesStrategic ManagementAgricultural Development & Policy AnalysisPublic FinanceAgri Supply Chain & Logistics ManagementManagement of Agricultural Input MarketingProject Management, Appraisal & Agri-EntrepreneurshipRural MarketingNatural Resource & Environmental EconomicsQuality Management & Food StandardsBusiness Statistics & Quantitative MethodsManagerial (Applied Agribusiness) EconomicsMicroeconomic Theory & ApplicationsCommodity Markets, Futures & OptionsEconomic Development and Agricultural Economies of the World

Institutional Economics for other exams

UGC-NET · IndiaChina Agricultural University PhD, application-and-assessment track · ChinaASRB NET and ARS / SMS / STO recruitment · IndiaWageningen MSc Management, Economics & Consumer Studies · Netherlands

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.