LAISHA
Open Laisha

ASRB NET and ARS / SMS / STO recruitment Agricultural Production Economics: practice questions

ASRB NET and ARS / SMS / STO recruitment · India · Agricultural Scientists Recruitment Board (ICAR)

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
92written to this exam in this subject
15syllabus units

What this subject covers

The economics of turning inputs into farm output: production functions, the three basic relationships, optimum input use, efficiency, scale and risk.

In the exams: agricultural master's entrance examinations, factor-product relationships (heavy); agricultural economics PhD entrance and fellowship examinations, production economics (heavy); agricultural scientist eligibility tests (heavy)

Where the 92 questions fall

How our questions for ASRB NET and ARS / SMS / STO recruitment spread across the units of Agricultural Production Economics. Difficulty: 9 easy, 58 medium, 25 hard.

Forms of production function and their estimation9
Technical and allocative efficiency and production frontiers9
Types of risk and enterprise combination under risk9
Optimum input use: MVP equals MFC8
Duality among production, cost and profit functions8
Cost minimisation7
Economies of scale and size7
Technological change7
Theory of the family farm7
Law of variable proportions and the three stages of production5
Product-product relationship5
Factor-product relationship3
Factor-factor relationship3
Isoquants and isoclines3
Scope of production economics compared with farm management2

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Law of variable proportions and the three stages of production · hard

Under constant returns to scale, stage I for the variable input corresponds to which stage for the fixed input?

  1. Stage III, where the fixed input's marginal product is negative
  2. Stage I, where both inputs have rising average products
  3. Stage II, where both marginal products are positive and falling
  4. No stage, because the fixed input has no marginal product
Answer and working

A. Stage III, where the fixed input's marginal product is negative

With linear homogeneity the two stages are symmetric: where the variable input is too scarce relative to the fixed one (stage I), the fixed input is in excess and its marginal product is negative (its stage III). This is a second reason stage I is irrational.

Further reading: Doll and Orazem, Production Economics: Theory with Applications

2 · Optimum input use: MVP equals MFC · medium

With Y = 10X^0.5, output price 2 and input price 1, the profit-maximising input level is

  1. 100 units
  2. 10 units
  3. 400 units
  4. 25 units
Answer and working

A. 100 units

MPP = 5X^-0.5, so MVP = 2 x 5/sqrt(X) = 10/sqrt(X). Set equal to MFC = 1: sqrt(X) = 10, X = 100. Stopping at sqrt(X) gives 10; forgetting the 0.5 in MPP gives 400. Ignoring the output price (setting MPP = 1) gives 25.

Further reading: Debertin, Agricultural Production Economics

3 · Optimum input use: MVP equals MFC · easy

A resource-use-efficiency study finds the ratio MVP/MFC for fertiliser is 1.8. The correct interpretation is that fertiliser is

  1. over-used, and reducing its use would raise profit
  2. used at the optimum
  3. in stage III of production
  4. under-used, and increasing its use would raise profit
Answer and working

D. under-used, and increasing its use would raise profit

A ratio above one means the last unit returns more than it costs, so more should be used until the ratio falls to one. A ratio below one indicates over-use. Stage III would give a negative MVP and so a negative ratio.

Further reading: Heady and Dillon, Agricultural Production Functions

4 · Cost minimisation · medium

The expansion path is the

  1. ridge line where MPP of one input is zero
  2. locus of maximum APP points
  3. long-run average cost curve
  4. isocline along which MRTS equals the input price ratio
Answer and working

D. isocline along which MRTS equals the input price ratio

Every point on the expansion path is a least-cost point for its output at the given prices. Ridge lines are the boundaries of the economic region; the expansion path is one particular isocline within it.

Further reading: Debertin, Agricultural Production Economics

5 · Cost minimisation · hard

A farm's estimated Cobb-Douglas elasticities for all inputs sum to 1.15. What happens if one tries to find a profit maximum along the expansion path at constant prices?

  1. The profit maximum is where average cost is minimum
  2. The profit maximum coincides with the least-cost point for any output
  3. No finite profit maximum exists, as marginal cost keeps falling with output
  4. The function reaches maximum output, which is then also the profit maximum for the farm
Answer and working

C. No finite profit maximum exists, as marginal cost keeps falling with output

With increasing returns to scale the cost function is concave in output and marginal cost declines, so MC = P gives a profit minimum, not maximum. Cost minimisation is still possible for any given output; Cobb-Douglas has no output maximum.

Further reading: Beattie, Taylor and Watts, The Economics of Production

6 · Economies of scale and size · medium

A production function is homogeneous of degree 0.8. If all inputs are doubled, output

  1. rises by a factor of 1.741
  2. rises by a factor of 1.6
  3. doubles
  4. rises by a factor of 2.378
Answer and working

A. rises by a factor of 1.741

Homogeneous of degree k: f(tX) = t^k f(X) = 2^0.8 = 1.741. Multiplying 2 x 0.8 = 1.6 is the common slip.

Further reading: Chambers, Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach

7 · Technical and allocative efficiency and production frontiers · medium

Efficiency scores from a frontier analysis of 200 farms in one district are best interpreted as

  1. absolute measures comparable across any study
  2. measures of profitability
  3. relative to the best performers in that sample, not absolute measures of efficiency
  4. measures of allocative efficiency only
Answer and working

C. relative to the best performers in that sample, not absolute measures of efficiency

Frontiers are built from the observed farms, so a score of 1.0 means best among those observed. Scores from different samples or methods are not directly comparable.

Further reading: Coelli, Rao, O'Donnell and Battese, An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis

8 · Technological change · medium

Tractors and combine harvesters are examples of technology that is mainly

  1. land-saving
  2. labour-saving
  3. neutral
  4. capital-saving
Answer and working

B. labour-saving

Mechanical technology raises output per worker and substitutes capital for labour, so it is labour-saving (capital-using). Improved seed and fertiliser are the classic land-saving (biological-chemical) technologies.

Further reading: Hayami and Ruttan, Agricultural Development

9 · Theory of the family farm · easy

In Chayanov's theory of the peasant family farm, the family applies its labour until

  1. marginal product of labour equals the market wage paid to hired agricultural workers
  2. the marginal drudgery of work equals the marginal utility of the extra consumption
  3. total output is maximum
  4. labour productivity is maximum
Answer and working

B. the marginal drudgery of work equals the marginal utility of the extra consumption

Chayanov's family does not pay itself a wage; it balances the disutility of extra work against the benefit of extra consumption. Setting MVP of labour to the wage is the capitalist (separable) rule.

Further reading: Chayanov, The Theory of Peasant Economy

10 · Duality among production, cost and profit functions · hard

A cost function is C = 2y(w1 w2)^0.5. At y = 10, w1 = 4 and w2 = 9, the cost-minimising demand for input 1 is

  1. 6.667
  2. 15
  3. 120
  4. 30
Answer and working

B. 15

By Shephard's lemma, x1 = dC/dw1 = 2y x 0.5 x w1^-0.5 w2^0.5 = y(w2/w1)^0.5 = 10 x (9/4)^0.5 = 10 x 1.5 = 15. 120 is total cost; inverting the price ratio gives 6.667; forgetting the 0.5 from differentiation gives 30.

Further reading: Chambers, Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach

Ten here, 92 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to ASRB NET and ARS / SMS / STO recruitment in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Agricultural Production EconomicsThe full study manual, free ASRB NET and ARS / SMS / STO recruitmentFormat, sections and how it has changed

More ASRB NET and ARS / SMS / STO recruitment practice

Macroeconomics & PolicyMarketing ManagementNatural Resource & Environmental EconomicsStrategic ManagementPublic FinanceMicroeconomic Theory & ApplicationsDevelopment EconomicsAgricultural Development & Policy AnalysisInternational Agri Trade & Export ManagementManagerial (Applied Agribusiness) EconomicsBusiness Statistics & Quantitative MethodsEconomic Development and Agricultural Economies of the WorldProject Management, Appraisal & Agri-EntrepreneurshipRural MarketingSector-specific Agribusiness ElectivesInstitutional EconomicsFinancial & Managerial AccountingHuman Resource ManagementOperations Research / Quantitative TechniquesAgribusiness Environment & PolicyAgricultural Extension Management & CommunicationQuality Management & Food Standards

Agricultural Production Economics for other exams

ICAR AIEEA-PG · IndiaICAR AICE-JRF/SRF · India

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.