LAISHA
Open Laisha

NABARD Assistant Manager Grade A Natural Resource & Environmental Economics: practice questions

NABARD Assistant Manager Grade A (RDBS) · India · National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
21written to this exam in this subject
9syllabus units

What this subject covers

Economics applied to land, water, forests and the environment: property rights, depletion, valuing what markets do not price, and correcting externalities.

In the exams: agricultural economics PhD entrance and fellowship examinations, resource and environmental economics (heavy); agricultural scientist eligibility tests (heavy); agricultural development bank officer recruitment, climate change and soil and water conservation (present)

Where the 21 questions fall

How our questions for NABARD Assistant Manager Grade A spread across the units of Natural Resource & Environmental Economics. Difficulty: 8 easy, 13 medium, 0 hard.

Command-and-control versus emission trading4
Economics of water resources4
Environmental impact assessment4
Ecosystem services3
Property rights2
Common property and open access1
Environmental accounting1
Sustainability indicators1
Externalities and the Pigouvian tax1

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Ecosystem services · easy

Soil formation and nutrient cycling are classed in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment as:

  1. Provisioning services
  2. Cultural and spiritual services
  3. Supporting services
  4. Existence (non-use) values
Answer and working

C. Supporting services

Supporting services underlie all other services: soil formation, nutrient cycling and primary production. Existence value is a component of total economic value, not a service category.

Further reading: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005

2 · Common property and open access · medium

In a hard-rock area, farmers keep drilling deeper borewells as the water table falls, each trying to keep pace with neighbours. Economists describe this as:

  1. Efficient extraction along a Hotelling path
  2. Competitive deepening, an open-access outcome that dissipates resource rent
  3. A pecuniary externality requiring no correction
  4. Optimal adaptation that maximises total farm income
Answer and working

B. Competitive deepening, an open-access outcome that dissipates resource rent

When no one has rights to the aquifer, each user's pumping raises others' costs and reduces their water, and each deepens to avoid being left dry. Aggregate pumping cost rises without more water, the open-access rent-dissipation result. The effect on neighbours is a technological externality through the resource, not through prices.

Further reading: Shah; Tietenberg and Lewis

3 · Property rights · medium

Nitrate from thousands of farms reaches a city's drinking water supply. Why is a Coasean bargain between the farmers and the city's residents unlikely to solve the problem?

  1. Coase showed bargaining works only when the polluter holds the rights
  2. Drinking water is a private good and cannot be bargained over
  3. Transaction costs are high: many parties, diffuse and hard-to-trace damage, and incentives to free-ride
  4. The Coase theorem does not apply to agricultural externalities by definition, since farming is exempt from liability rules
Answer and working

C. Transaction costs are high: many parties, diffuse and hard-to-trace damage, and incentives to free-ride

Coase's result needs low transaction costs. With many dispersed polluters and victims, non-point emissions that cannot be attributed to individual farms, and free-riding among beneficiaries, negotiation fails and public intervention is needed.

Further reading: Coase 1960; Tietenberg and Lewis

4 · Command-and-control versus emission trading · easy

The European Union Emissions Trading System, the first large international carbon trading scheme, began operating in:

  1. 2005
  2. 1990
  3. 1997
  4. 2015
Answer and working

A. 2005

The EU ETS started in 2005. 1990 is the US Clean Air Act Amendments that created SO2 trading; 1997 the Kyoto Protocol; 2015 the Paris Agreement.

Further reading: European Commission

5 · Economics of water resources · medium

Many states supply electricity to farm pumps at a flat rate per horsepower or free. The main economic effect on groundwater use is that:

  1. Farmers pump less because they fear frequent power cuts and so ration their use of the free electricity
  2. The marginal cost of pumping falls to near zero, encouraging extraction beyond the efficient level
  3. Groundwater becomes a private good
  4. The Hotelling rule ensures efficient depletion
Answer and working

B. The marginal cost of pumping falls to near zero, encouraging extraction beyond the efficient level

With a flat power charge each extra hour of pumping costs almost nothing, so farmers pump until the marginal value of water is near zero, ignoring both private energy costs and the scarcity value. This drives overdraft in many hard-rock and alluvial areas.

Further reading: Shah; World Bank

6 · Economics of water resources · medium

The concept of 'virtual water', introduced by Tony Allan, refers to:

  1. Water stored in reservoirs for future use
  2. Water rights that exist only on paper
  3. The water used to produce a commodity, which is implicitly traded when the commodity is traded
  4. Rain-fed soil moisture that is not recorded in official water statistics or in any irrigation accounts
Answer and working

C. The water used to produce a commodity, which is implicitly traded when the commodity is traded

Virtual water is the water embodied in products; a country importing grain imports the water used to grow it. It is an accounting idea: efficient trade still depends on the opportunity cost of all inputs, not water alone. Green water, not virtual water, refers to soil moisture from rain.

Further reading: Allan 1998

7 · Environmental impact assessment · easy

The first stage of an EIA, which decides whether a proposed project needs an assessment and at what level, is called:

  1. Scoping
  2. Appraisal
  3. Screening
  4. Monitoring
Answer and working

C. Screening

Screening decides whether EIA is required. Scoping follows and sets the terms of reference, the impacts and alternatives to study. Appraisal reviews the report; monitoring comes after clearance.

Further reading: UNEP EIA Training Resource Manual

8 · Environmental impact assessment · easy

India's current EIA framework is based on a notification issued in 2006 under which Act?

  1. The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
  2. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
  3. The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
  4. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Answer and working

D. The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986

The EIA Notification of 14 September 2006 was issued under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The Water and Air Acts deal with consent to operate from pollution control boards; the Forest Act with diversion of forest land.

Further reading: MoEF EIA Notification 2006

9 · Environmental impact assessment · medium

Under India's EIA Notification, 2006, Category A projects are appraised at which level?

  1. Central level, by the Ministry with its Expert Appraisal Committee
  2. State level, by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
  3. District level, by the District Collector
  4. Village level, by the gram sabha
Answer and working

A. Central level, by the Ministry with its Expert Appraisal Committee

Category A projects are appraised centrally. Category B projects are appraised by State-level authorities and split into B1 (requiring EIA) and B2 (exempt from full EIA). Thresholds by project type change with amendments and must be checked in the current notification.

Further reading: MoEF EIA Notification 2006

10 · Property rights · easy

In a pure open-access fishery, which statement about property rights is correct?

  1. A defined community holds rights and can exclude outsiders
  2. No one holds rights to the stock and no one can be excluded
  3. The state owns and manages the stock
  4. Each fisher owns a transferable share of the catch
Answer and working

B. No one holds rights to the stock and no one can be excluded

Open access is the absence of property rights. Community rights describe common property; state ownership is state property; transferable catch shares are individual transferable quotas.

Further reading: Ciriacy-Wantrup and Bishop 1975

Ten here, 21 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to NABARD Assistant Manager Grade A in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Natural Resource & Environmental EconomicsThe full study manual, free NABARD Assistant Manager Grade AFormat, sections and how it has changed

More NABARD Assistant Manager Grade A practice

Agriculture & Food Systems (bridge)Economic Development and Agricultural Economies of the WorldRural Development, Local Governance & LivelihoodsAgricultural Finance, Credit & Rural BankingDevelopment EconomicsCooperatives & Farmer Producer OrganisationsAgricultural Marketing & Price AnalysisFood Processing & Technology ManagementRural Society, Polity & InstitutionsComputer Applications & MISAgri Infrastructure & WarehousingPublic FinanceSector-specific Agribusiness ElectivesAgri Risk Management & InsuranceBusiness Statistics & Quantitative Methods

Natural Resource & Environmental Economics for other exams

ASRB NET and ARS / SMS / STO recruitment · IndiaICAR AICE-JRF/SRF · IndiaNABARD Manager Grade B · India

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.