LAISHA
Open Laisha

CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate Climate Models, Scenarios & Downscaling: practice questions

CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate (formerly Certificate in ESG Investing) · International · CFA Institute

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
16written to this exam in this subject
5syllabus units

About CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate

CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate (formerly Certificate in ESG Investing) is a professional certification run by CFA Institute, for candidates worldwide. Self-study with a 6-month access period and one exam taken in person or online; about 100+ hours of study recommended. Question count and duration were not on the page read.

Source: cfainstitute.org.

Checked against the exam body's published information. Formats and fees change; confirm the current edition there before you book.

Climate Models, Scenarios & Downscaling in CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate

Scenario analysis, TCFD/ISSB requirements, NGFS and IEA scenarios, and the meaning and limits of climate projections for investment and policy.

How future climate is projected and how to use projections responsibly: model hierarchy, CMIP ensembles, RCP and SSP scenarios, downscaling and bias correction, and uncertainty. Needed for impact studies, climate-risk disclosure and adaptation planning.

Our 16 CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate questions in this subject: 4 easy, 11 medium, 1 hard, across 5 units.

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

These 10 were written to CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate and are not shown on any other exam's page.

Question 1 · medium

Why does AR6 present many regional projections by global warming level, such as 2 °C, rather than only by scenario and year?

  1. It makes all regional changes identical, so one map suits every region
  2. It is required because no scenario reaches more than 2 °C of warming
  3. It allows regional results to ignore greenhouse gas concentrations entirely
  4. It limits the effect of differing sensitivities and ties change to targets
Answer and working

D. It limits the effect of differing sensitivities and ties change to targets

Expressing change at a warming level groups model results by how much each has warmed, reducing the spread caused by different sensitivities and relating directly to targets. Concentrations still matter, regional changes differ, and several scenarios exceed 2 °C.

Question 2 · medium

Why do regional rainfall projections often disagree in sign between models?

  1. Model spread and internal variability stay large for regional rain
  2. All models agree, and apparent disagreement comes from unit conversion errors
  3. Rainfall is not simulated by climate models, only estimated afterwards
  4. Scenario choice alone determines the sign, so models never differ
Answer and working

A. Model spread and internal variability stay large for regional rain

Regional rainfall depends on circulation changes that models simulate differently, and on large internal variability, so signs can disagree. Models do simulate rainfall, and inter-model disagreement is real.

Question 3 · medium

An analyst cites the projected change for a single grid cell in a single year as a prediction. What is the error?

  1. Projections for single years are always exact if the model is good enough
  2. Projections cannot be expressed for any period shorter than one century
  3. Internal variability dominates single years and cells, so it is not a forecast
  4. Grid cells are always too large for any projection to be stated for them
Answer and working

C. Internal variability dominates single years and cells, so it is not a forecast

At small scales and short periods internal variability is large, so a single-year, single-cell value from one projection is not a prediction; multi-decade means and ranges are appropriate.

Question 4 · easy

Which pair correctly distinguishes acute and chronic physical climate risks?

  1. Acute: risks lasting more than a decade; chronic: risks lasting less than a week
  2. Acute: risks to banks only; chronic: risks to farms and households only
  3. Acute: carbon taxes and regulation; chronic: litigation and reputational damage
  4. Acute: extreme events such as floods; chronic: long-term shifts such as sea-level rise
Answer and working

D. Acute: extreme events such as floods; chronic: long-term shifts such as sea-level rise

Acute physical risks are event-driven (floods, cyclones, heatwaves); chronic risks are longer-term shifts (warming, sea-level rise, rainfall change). Carbon taxes and litigation are transition risks.

Question 5 · easy

Which of the following is a transition risk?

  1. Sea-level rise that salinises coastal farmland
  2. A carbon price on fertiliser production
  3. A cyclone that destroys a grain warehouse
  4. A heatwave that cuts milk yields on dairy farms
Answer and working

B. A carbon price on fertiliser production

Transition risks arise from the shift to a low-carbon economy: policy, technology, market and reputation. Heatwaves, sea-level rise and cyclones are physical risks.

Question 6 · medium

What did the TCFD recommendations ask organisations to disclose regarding scenarios?

  1. A single forecast of their emissions in 2100 under the most likely climate scenario
  2. Strategy resilience under several scenarios, including one at 2 °C or lower
  3. Only the physical risks to assets located within their home country
  4. The temperature outcome of every scenario published by the IPCC since 1990
Answer and working

B. Strategy resilience under several scenarios, including one at 2 °C or lower

TCFD's strategy pillar asked for the resilience of strategy under different scenarios, including a 2 °C or lower scenario. It did not ask for a single forecast, every IPCC scenario or domestic-only physical risk.

Question 7 · medium

How are physical and transition risks typically related across climate scenarios?

  1. Strong mitigation raises near-term transition risk and lowers long-run physical risk
  2. The two risks are unrelated, so scenarios can treat them independently
  3. Weak mitigation lowers both physical and transition risk at the same time
  4. Strong mitigation raises both physical and transition risk at the same time
Answer and working

A. Strong mitigation raises near-term transition risk and lowers long-run physical risk

Ambitious policy brings transition costs but limits warming and physical damage; weak action does the reverse. They are inversely linked in scenario design.

Question 8 · medium

Which IEA scenario describes a pathway to net zero energy-sector CO₂ emissions by 2050?

  1. Current Policies hot house
  2. Stated Policies Scenario
  3. Announced Pledges Scenario
  4. Net Zero Emissions by 2050
Answer and working

D. Net Zero Emissions by 2050

The NZE scenario is normative, reaching net zero energy-sector emissions by 2050. STEPS reflects existing policies; APS assumes announced pledges are met; 'hot house' is NGFS terminology.

Question 9 · hard

Which is a common pitfall in corporate climate scenario analysis?

  1. Using more than one scenario to span plausible physical and transition outcomes
  2. Including compound risks such as heat and drought in sourcing regions together
  3. Choosing time horizons such as 2050 that are long enough to show physical risk
  4. Presenting precise financial numbers from long, uncertain model chains
Answer and working

D. Presenting precise financial numbers from long, uncertain model chains

False precision is a frequent error; multiple scenarios, long horizons and compound risks are good practice. Other pitfalls include treating one scenario as expected and using averages that hide extremes.

Question 10 · medium

What does IFRS S2 (2023) require regarding climate scenario analysis?

  1. Using only the SSP5-8.5 scenario for every entity regardless of size
  2. Using climate-related scenario analysis to assess resilience, proportionate to the entity's circumstances
  3. Avoiding scenarios entirely and reporting only historical emissions
  4. Publishing raw climate model data for every asset the entity owns
Answer and working

B. Using climate-related scenario analysis to assess resilience, proportionate to the entity's circumstances

IFRS S2 requires climate-related scenario analysis to assess climate resilience, with an approach commensurate with the entity's circumstances. It does not prescribe one scenario, raw data publication, or avoidance of scenarios.

A study plan for Climate Models, Scenarios & Downscaling in CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate

This plan follows where our questions actually fall, so the time goes where the marks are likely to be. It is our reading of the syllabus, not the exam body's weighting.

  1. First, the heavy units (69% of the 16 questions): Scenario analysis for organisations: physical and transition scenarios (8, 50%); Integrated assessment models and mitigation pathways (3, 19%).

    Read the manual chapters for these first and do every worked question you can find on them.

  2. Then the middle band: Representative Concentration Pathways and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (2, 13%); Sources of uncertainty: scenario, model and internal variability (2, 13%).

    Aim for one sitting per unit, then mixed questions across them.

  3. Then the lighter units: CMIP ensembles and model evaluation (1, 6%).

    Learn the definitions, classifications and standard numbers; these units are more often recalled than worked.

  4. Leave time for the hard ones: Scenario analysis for organisations: physical and transition scenarios (1 hard of 8).

    Come back to these after a first pass, untimed, and read every explanation, including for the options you rejected.

  5. Bank the easy marks: Integrated assessment models and mitigation pathways (2 easy of 3); Scenario analysis for organisations: physical and transition scenarios (2 easy of 8).

    Do these early in revision so they are fast on the day.

  6. Finish timed. Sit the subject as a timed set without notes, mark it, and send each wrong answer back to its unit above.

Last updated · How Laisha writes and checks its pages · Report a mistake

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.

Unlock every question — CFA Institute Sustainable Investing Certificate Climate Models, Scenarios & Downscaling

US$10 a month · one price worldwide · cancel any time

  • Every practice question in this subject, with full working
  • Timed exam papers and progress by unit
  • Ask Laisha to explain any answer — up to 1,000 questions a month
Free or Smarter
FreeSmarter
Grow guides, pest pages, articlesRead allRead all
Ask Laisha5 a dayUp to 1,000 a month
Exam practiceThe sample on each pageEvery question, timed papers
Crop calendar and pest alerts—For your own fields
Calculators and tools—All
Uploads and reports—100 a month, real files
10 days free for every new account, no card.