Sustainability Excellence Associate (SEA) and Sustainability Excellence Professional (SEP) · International · Green Business Certification Inc., with the International Society of Sustainability Professionals as education partner
Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papersSustainability Excellence Associate (SEA) and Sustainability Excellence Professional (SEP) is a professional certification run by Green Business Certification Inc., with the International Society of Sustainability Professionals as education partner, for candidates worldwide. Online (remote) or test-centre examinations administered by GBCI; SEA is entry level and a prerequisite for SEP. Question count and duration are in GBCI's candidate handbook, not on the page read.
Source: sustainabilityprofessionals.org.
Checked against the exam body's published information. Formats and fees change; confirm the current edition there before you book.
Counting greenhouse gases for nations, organisations, farms and products: IPCC inventory guidelines, the GHG Protocol corporate and Scope 3 standards, land-sector guidance, ISO 14064, emission factors and tiers, and science-based targets.
Our 15 Sustainability Excellence Associate and Sustainability Excellence Professional questions in this subject: 3 easy, 10 medium, 2 hard, across 8 units.
Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.
These 10 were written to Sustainability Excellence Associate and Sustainability Excellence Professional and are not shown on any other exam's page.
On a mixed farm, which emission is Scope 1 under the GHG Protocol?
C. Methane from enteric fermentation in the farm's own cattle
Enteric methane from owned animals is a direct emission from a controlled source: Scope 1. Purchased electricity is Scope 2; fertiliser manufacture is Scope 3 category 1; the processor's emissions are Scope 3 category 10 for the farm.
The same choice in reverse: a food company owns 40% of a joint-venture plant emitting 10,000 t CO2e but has no control over it. Using the equity share approach, how much enters its inventory?
A. 4,000 t CO2e
Equity share accounts in proportion to economic interest: 0.40 x 10,000 = 4,000 t. 10,000 would apply under a control approach with control; 6,000 is the other partners' share; 1,600 squares the share by mistake.
A poultry processor installs rooftop solar panels and uses all the power on site, exporting none. How is this reflected in its inventory?
D. Electricity from the panels carries zero Scope 2 emissions, so purchased grid electricity and Scope 2 fall
Self-generated, self-consumed renewable electricity has no generation emissions and is not purchased, so it simply reduces grid purchases and Scope 2. Avoided emissions are never subtracted from any scope, and negative Scope 3 entries are not allowed.
Why can a spend-based Scope 3 estimate fail to show a supplier farm's real emission reduction?
C. It scales with money spent, so cutting farm emissions without changing price leaves the estimate unchanged
Spend-based factors are sector averages per currency unit; they reflect price, not practice. Supplier-specific or activity-based methods are needed to capture farm-level change. Spend-based methods are not supplier-specific, cover all purchases and are not limited to capital goods.
What is the difference between insetting and offsetting for a food company?
B. Insetting reduces or removes emissions within its own value chain; offsetting buys credits from projects outside it
Insetting works inside the value chain (for example paying supplier farms to plant hedges or cut fertiliser), so the effect shows in the company's own Scope 3 or removals; offsets are external credits, reported separately. The terms are not tied to particular scopes and are not synonyms.
A buyer pays farmers to adopt practices that cut N2O and counts the result in its Scope 3, while the farmers also sell carbon credits for the same reductions. What is the problem, and what prevents it?
B. Double claiming of the same tonnes; a data-sharing agreement should allocate who may claim the reductions
The same reduction is claimed twice -- once in the buyer's inventory and once by whoever buys the credits. Contracts need to settle claims. Both claims use t CO2e; adding credits to Scope 1 is wrong; leakage is a different issue.
Which of these is NOT one of the five data quality indicators in the GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard?
A. Profitability of the supplier
The five indicators are technological, temporal and geographical representativeness, completeness and reliability. A supplier's profitability says nothing about data quality.
A dairy group with base-year emissions of 10,000 t CO2e buys a cheese plant that existed in the base year, when it emitted 2,000 t. What is the recalculated base year?
D. 12,000 t CO2e
Acquisition of a facility that existed in the base year adds its base-year emissions: 10,000 + 2,000 = 12,000 t. Leaving 10,000 would make the acquisition look like growth; subtraction is for divestment; there is no rule to add half.
Which statement compares absolute and intensity targets correctly?
A. An absolute target limits total tonnes; under an intensity target, total tonnes rise if output grows enough
Absolute targets cap total emissions; intensity targets cap emissions per unit, so absolute emissions rise if output grows faster than intensity falls. Neither is inherently annual or stricter; the definitions in the other options are swapped or invented.
Under SBTi near-term criteria, what minimum share of Scope 1 and 2 emissions must a target cover?
B. 95%
Near-term targets must cover at least 95% of Scope 1 and 2. 67% is the minimum near-term Scope 3 coverage and 90% the long-term Scope 3 coverage; 100% is not required.
This plan follows where our questions actually fall, so the time goes where the marks are likely to be. It is our reading of the syllabus, not the exam body's weighting.
Read the manual chapters for these first and do every worked question you can find on them.
Aim for one sitting per unit, then mixed questions across them.
Learn the definitions, classifications and standard numbers; these units are more often recalled than worked.
Come back to these after a first pass, untimed, and read every explanation, including for the options you rejected.
Do these early in revision so they are fast on the day.
Last updated · How Laisha writes and checks its pages · Report a mistake
US$10 a month · one price worldwide · cancel any time
| Free | Smarter | |
|---|---|---|
| Grow guides, pest pages, articles | Read all | Read all |
| Ask Laisha | 5 a day | Up to 1,000 a month |
| Exam practice | The sample on each page | Every question, timed papers |
| Crop calendar and pest alerts | — | For your own fields |
| Calculators and tools | — | All |
| Uploads and reports | — | 100 a month, real files |
An AI operating system for agriculture: free guides, manuals and tools written for every country.