LAISHA
Open Laisha

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF Forestry Research Methods & Experimental Design: practice questions

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF (PhD) — Subject 59 Forestry · India · National Testing Agency for ICAR

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
44written to this exam in this subject
9syllabus units

What this subject covers

Designing and analysing forestry research: field experiments with long-lived trees, advanced designs, mixed models, long-term plots and scientific writing.

In the exams: ICAR AICE-JRF 59 (PhD level across units); ICAR AICE-JRF Part A; ASRB NET and ARS recruitment

Where the 44 questions fall

How our questions for ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF spread across the units of Forestry Research Methods & Experimental Design. Difficulty: 0 easy, 26 medium, 18 hard.

Factorial, split-plot and incomplete block designs6
Mixed-effects models and repeated measures6
Multivariate methods: PCA, cluster analysis, ordination6
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews6
Scientific method and research problem formulation5
Field experiments with trees: plot size, borders, replication4
Research ethics, data management and reproducible analysis4
Scientific writing, peer review and research proposals4
Long-term experiments and permanent sample plots3

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Scientific method and research problem formulation · medium

Why can a well-designed manipulative experiment support a causal claim more strongly than an observational study across sites?

  1. Experiments always use more replicates than any observational study can
  2. Randomisation breaks links between treatment and unmeasured confounders
  3. Observational studies cannot be analysed with statistics
  4. Experiments do not require any measurement of the response
Answer and working

B. Randomisation breaks links between treatment and unmeasured confounders

Random assignment makes treatment independent of unmeasured variables on average. Observational studies can be large and well analysed, but confounding remains possible.

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

2 · Scientific method and research problem formulation · hard

Two treatments are to be compared with σ = 4 cm, smallest important difference δ = 3 cm, α = 0.05 (z = 1.96) and power 0.80 (z = 0.84). Using n ≈ 2(z₁ + z₂)²σ² ÷ δ², how many replicates per treatment are needed?

  1. 14
  2. 28
  3. 21
  4. 56
Answer and working

B. 28

n ≈ 2 × (1.96 + 0.84)² × 16 ÷ 9 = 2 × 7.84 × 1.78 ≈ 27.9, rounded up to 28. 14 omits the factor of 2; 56 counts both treatments together.

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

3 · Scientific method and research problem formulation · hard

Which practice best reduces the risk that a research question is unanswerable with the planned study?

  1. Increasing the number of response variables measured
  2. Pilot data and a power analysis before committing to the design
  3. Choosing a significance level of 0.10 rather than the customary 0.05
  4. Deciding the analysis only after seeing all the data
Answer and working

B. Pilot data and a power analysis before committing to the design

A pilot study estimates variance and feasibility; power analysis tests whether the design can detect the effect. Deciding analyses after seeing the data invites p-hacking.

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

4 · Factorial, split-plot and incomplete block designs · medium

Alpha designs are popular in tree breeding trials mainly because they are:

  1. Complete block designs with one tree per family in each block
  2. Designs that need no randomisation of entries
  3. Resolvable incomplete block designs flexible in size
  4. Systematic designs for spacing comparisons
Answer and working

C. Resolvable incomplete block designs flexible in size

Alpha (alpha-lattice) designs group incomplete blocks into complete replicates and exist for many entry numbers and block sizes (Patterson and Williams 1976).

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

5 · Mixed-effects models and repeated measures · hard

Two models differ only in their fixed effects. To compare them by AIC or a likelihood ratio test you should fit them by:

  1. Maximum likelihood
  2. Restricted maximum likelihood
  3. Ordinary least squares on plot means
  4. The method of moments
Answer and working

A. Maximum likelihood

REML likelihoods depend on the fixed-effects structure and are not comparable across different fixed effects; ML must be used.

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

6 · Mixed-effects models and repeated measures · medium

Best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs) of family effects in a breeding trial:

  1. Equal the raw family means in every possible case
  2. Ignore the number of trees per family
  3. Are used only for fixed effects
  4. Shrink extreme family means towards the mean
Answer and working

D. Shrink extreme family means towards the mean

BLUPs shrink means in proportion to their unreliability, so families with few trees are pulled more strongly to the mean.

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

7 · Mixed-effects models and repeated measures · hard

Model A has log-likelihood −250 with 5 parameters; model B has −246 with 8 parameters. Which has the lower AIC?

  1. Model A: −490 against −476 for B
  2. Model A: 500 against 492 for B
  3. Neither: both equal 509
  4. Model B: 508 against 510 for A
Answer and working

D. Model B: 508 against 510 for A

AIC = 2k − 2 ln L: A = 10 + 500 = 510; B = 16 + 492 = 508, so B is lower, though a difference of 2 is modest support. −490 and −476 come from adding 2 ln L instead of subtracting it; 500 and 492 omit the parameter penalty and compare −2 ln L alone.

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

8 · Multivariate methods: PCA, cluster analysis, ordination · hard

Site A has abundances (10, 5, 0) and site B (6, 5, 3) of three species. What is the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity?

  1. 0.76
  2. 0.38
  3. 0.24
  4. 0.11
Answer and working

C. 0.24

C = 6 + 5 + 0 = 11; BC = 1 − 2 × 11 ÷ (15 + 14) = 1 − 22 ÷ 29 ≈ 0.24. 0.76 is the similarity, 22 ÷ 29.

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

9 · Multivariate methods: PCA, cluster analysis, ordination · medium

An NMDS ordination of plot communities has a stress of 0.25. This indicates:

  1. An excellent fit that explains 75% of the variation
  2. A perfect representation of the dissimilarities
  3. That the arch effect has been removed
  4. A poor fit; interpret the ordination with caution
Answer and working

D. A poor fit; interpret the ordination with caution

Stress above about 0.2 is regarded as poor. Stress is not a proportion of variance explained.

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

10 · Research ethics, data management and reproducible analysis · medium

A researcher runs 10 independent tests and applies a Bonferroni correction for an overall α of 0.05. Each test uses:

  1. 0.05
  2. 0.5
  3. 0.005
  4. 0.0005
Answer and working

C. 0.005

α ÷ m = 0.05 ÷ 10 = 0.005.

Further reading: Gomez K; Montgomery D; Hurlbert S; Williams E

Ten here, 44 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Forestry Research Methods & Experimental DesignThe full study manual, free ICAR AICE-JRF/SRFFormat, sections and how it has changed

More ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF practice

Agroforestry Management, Interactions & EconomicsTree PhysiologyForest Restoration & Afforestation of Difficult SitesVegetative Propagation & Forest BiotechnologyBiometry, Statistics & Computing for ForestryForest Meteorology & ClimatologyConservation Biology & Forest Genetic ResourcesForest Soils & Soil ConservationLandscape Ecology & Forest Ecosystem ModellingForests & Climate Change: Carbon, REDD+ & MRVIntroduction to Forestry & the World's ForestsForest Fire Science & ManagementAgroforestry Systems & DesignGrowth & Yield ModellingForest Entomology & Integrated Pest ManagementForest Pathology & Wood DecayWildlife Biology & EcologyForest Operations, Harvesting & Forest EngineeringForest Policy, Law & GovernanceUrban Forestry & ArboricultureForest Hydrology & Watershed ManagementWildlife Management & Protected AreasWood Anatomy & Wood PropertiesForest Economics & Valuation

Forestry Research Methods & Experimental Design for other exams

FRI Deemed University · IndiaICAR AIEEA-PG · India

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.