LAISHA
Open Laisha

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF Landscape Ecology & Forest Ecosystem Modelling: practice questions

ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF (PhD) — Subject 59 Forestry · India · National Testing Agency for ICAR

Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papers
10worked here, free
47written to this exam in this subject
9syllabus units

What this subject covers

Forests at landscape scale: patterns and processes, fragmentation and connectivity, disturbance and succession models, and decision-support for landscape planning. Builds on the Sustainability track's landscape-ecology-protected-areas with forest disturbance and forest landscape models.

In the exams: PG and PhD level; ICAR AICE-JRF 59 Unit 11; GATE EY Section 1 and 5

Where the 47 questions fall

How our questions for ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF spread across the units of Landscape Ecology & Forest Ecosystem Modelling. Difficulty: 3 easy, 28 medium, 16 hard.

Landscape metrics and their interpretation6
Disturbance and succession modelling at landscape scale6
Forest landscape models and scenario analysis6
Ecosystem process models: carbon, water, nutrient fluxes6
Fragmentation and edge effects5
Connectivity and corridor design5
Species distribution modelling5
Landscape planning and stakeholder decision support5
Landscape structure: patches, corridors, matrix3

10 practice questions, worked

Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.

1 · Landscape metrics and their interpretation · medium

For three classes with H′ = 1.03, Shannon evenness H′ ÷ ln m is:

  1. 1.03
  2. 0.34
  3. 0.94
  4. 1.10
Answer and working

C. 0.94

Evenness = 1.03 ÷ ln 3 = 1.03 ÷ 1.10 ≈ 0.94; 1.10 is ln 3 itself.

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

2 · Landscape metrics and their interpretation · medium

A 100 km² landscape has forest patches of 40, 30 and 10 km². The effective mesh size is:

  1. 80 km²
  2. 27 km²
  3. 26 km²
  4. 8 km²
Answer and working

C. 26 km²

m_eff = (40² + 30² + 10²) ÷ 100 = 2,600 ÷ 100 = 26 km². 80 is total forest; 27 is the mean patch size (80 ÷ 3 ≈ 26.7).

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

3 · Landscape metrics and their interpretation · hard

A study compares the edge density of a landscape mapped from 1 m imagery in 2020 with the same landscape mapped from 30 m imagery in 2000, and reports a large increase. The main problem is:

  1. Edge density depends on grain, so the maps are not comparable
  2. Edge density cannot be computed for forest landscapes
  3. Shannon diversity should have been used instead
  4. The landscape must have been fragmented by roads
Answer and working

A. Edge density depends on grain, so the maps are not comparable

Finer grain resolves more small patches and edge; differences may come from the maps, not the landscape.

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

4 · Connectivity and corridor design · hard

Landscape genetics can test whether genetic distance among tree populations is better explained by:

  1. The number of seeds produced by each population in a good year
  2. The age of the oldest tree in each population
  3. The diameter of trees in each population
  4. Landscape resistance than by straight-line distance alone
Answer and working

D. Landscape resistance than by straight-line distance alone

Comparing isolation by distance with isolation by resistance tests which landscape features impede gene flow.

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

5 · Disturbance and succession modelling at landscape scale · hard

Why is the historical range of variability used cautiously as a management target under climate change?

  1. Historical conditions are always perfectly known
  2. Disturbance regimes never varied in the past
  3. Future climate need not support past conditions
  4. It applies only to forests without fire
Answer and working

C. Future climate need not support past conditions

Past regimes developed under past climates; they remain a useful reference but may be unattainable or maladaptive in future.

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

6 · Forest landscape models and scenario analysis · easy

In a scenario analysis of forest management, a scenario is best described as:

  1. A forecast of the single most probable future outcome
  2. A random set of parameter values
  3. The calibration dataset of the model
  4. A plausible, consistent account of a possible future
Answer and working

D. A plausible, consistent account of a possible future

Scenarios explore what could happen under stated assumptions; they are not predictions.

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

7 · Forest landscape models and scenario analysis · hard

Pattern-oriented modelling strengthens a forest landscape model by:

  1. Fitting it to one output while adjusting many parameters
  2. Testing it against multiple observed patterns at once
  3. Removing all stochastic processes from it
  4. Using only one spatial scale for every process
Answer and working

B. Testing it against multiple observed patterns at once

Matching multiple patterns at different scales constrains structure and parameters more than one fit.

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

8 · Forest landscape models and scenario analysis · hard

Why is validation of century-long forest landscape projections difficult?

  1. Landscape models have no parameters to test
  2. Historical data are never available for any forest
  3. Validation is not needed for landscape models
  4. The future cannot be observed independently
Answer and working

D. The future cannot be observed independently

Models can be tested against past records, reconstructions and multiple patterns, but not against the future they project.

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

9 · Ecosystem process models: carbon, water, nutrient fluxes · medium

With PAR of 2,500 MJ m⁻² yr⁻¹, fAPAR of 0.8 and light-use efficiency of 1.0 g C MJ⁻¹, GPP is:

  1. 2 t C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹
  2. 200 t C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹
  3. 25 t C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹
  4. 20 t C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹
Answer and working

D. 20 t C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹

GPP = 1.0 × 0.8 × 2,500 = 2,000 g C m⁻² = 20 t C ha⁻¹ (1 g m⁻² = 0.01 t ha⁻¹). 25 omits fAPAR.

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

10 · Landscape planning and stakeholder decision support · medium

In the land sharing versus land sparing debate, land sparing means:

  1. Wildlife-friendly farming practised on all land in the landscape
  2. Leaving all land unused for production
  3. Sharing land titles among communities
  4. High-yield production on part of the land to protect the rest
Answer and working

D. High-yield production on part of the land to protect the rest

Sparing separates intensive production from protected areas; sharing integrates both on the same land.

Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R

Ten here, 47 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.

Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.

Practise the full set in Laisha →

Read the subject

Landscape Ecology & Forest Ecosystem ModellingThe full study manual, free ICAR AICE-JRF/SRFFormat, sections and how it has changed

More ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF practice

Agroforestry Management, Interactions & EconomicsTree PhysiologyForest Restoration & Afforestation of Difficult SitesVegetative Propagation & Forest BiotechnologyBiometry, Statistics & Computing for ForestryForest Meteorology & ClimatologyConservation Biology & Forest Genetic ResourcesForest Soils & Soil ConservationForests & Climate Change: Carbon, REDD+ & MRVIntroduction to Forestry & the World's ForestsForestry Research Methods & Experimental DesignForest Fire Science & ManagementAgroforestry Systems & DesignGrowth & Yield ModellingForest Entomology & Integrated Pest ManagementForest Pathology & Wood DecayWildlife Biology & EcologyForest Operations, Harvesting & Forest EngineeringForest Policy, Law & GovernanceUrban Forestry & ArboricultureForest Hydrology & Watershed ManagementWildlife Management & Protected AreasWood Anatomy & Wood PropertiesForest Economics & Valuation

Landscape Ecology & Forest Ecosystem Modelling for other exams

GATE · IndiaUGC NET · India

Ask Laisha about this

Opens Laisha's chat with your question ready to send. Sign in or start free.