ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF (PhD) — Subject 59 Forestry · India · National Testing Agency for ICAR
Original practice questions written to the published syllabus · not past papersForests at landscape scale: patterns and processes, fragmentation and connectivity, disturbance and succession models, and decision-support for landscape planning. Builds on the Sustainability track's landscape-ecology-protected-areas with forest disturbance and forest landscape models.
In the exams: PG and PhD level; ICAR AICE-JRF 59 Unit 11; GATE EY Section 1 and 5
How our questions for ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF spread across the units of Landscape Ecology & Forest Ecosystem Modelling. Difficulty: 3 easy, 28 medium, 16 hard.
| Landscape metrics and their interpretation | 6 | |
| Disturbance and succession modelling at landscape scale | 6 | |
| Forest landscape models and scenario analysis | 6 | |
| Ecosystem process models: carbon, water, nutrient fluxes | 6 | |
| Fragmentation and edge effects | 5 | |
| Connectivity and corridor design | 5 | |
| Species distribution modelling | 5 | |
| Landscape planning and stakeholder decision support | 5 | |
| Landscape structure: patches, corridors, matrix | 3 |
Choose an answer, then open the working. Each explanation says why the right answer is right and why the others are not.
For three classes with H′ = 1.03, Shannon evenness H′ ÷ ln m is:
C. 0.94
Evenness = 1.03 ÷ ln 3 = 1.03 ÷ 1.10 ≈ 0.94; 1.10 is ln 3 itself.
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
A 100 km² landscape has forest patches of 40, 30 and 10 km². The effective mesh size is:
C. 26 km²
m_eff = (40² + 30² + 10²) ÷ 100 = 2,600 ÷ 100 = 26 km². 80 is total forest; 27 is the mean patch size (80 ÷ 3 ≈ 26.7).
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
A study compares the edge density of a landscape mapped from 1 m imagery in 2020 with the same landscape mapped from 30 m imagery in 2000, and reports a large increase. The main problem is:
A. Edge density depends on grain, so the maps are not comparable
Finer grain resolves more small patches and edge; differences may come from the maps, not the landscape.
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
Landscape genetics can test whether genetic distance among tree populations is better explained by:
D. Landscape resistance than by straight-line distance alone
Comparing isolation by distance with isolation by resistance tests which landscape features impede gene flow.
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
Why is the historical range of variability used cautiously as a management target under climate change?
C. Future climate need not support past conditions
Past regimes developed under past climates; they remain a useful reference but may be unattainable or maladaptive in future.
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
In a scenario analysis of forest management, a scenario is best described as:
D. A plausible, consistent account of a possible future
Scenarios explore what could happen under stated assumptions; they are not predictions.
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
Pattern-oriented modelling strengthens a forest landscape model by:
B. Testing it against multiple observed patterns at once
Matching multiple patterns at different scales constrains structure and parameters more than one fit.
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
Why is validation of century-long forest landscape projections difficult?
D. The future cannot be observed independently
Models can be tested against past records, reconstructions and multiple patterns, but not against the future they project.
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
With PAR of 2,500 MJ m⁻² yr⁻¹, fAPAR of 0.8 and light-use efficiency of 1.0 g C MJ⁻¹, GPP is:
D. 20 t C ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹
GPP = 1.0 × 0.8 × 2,500 = 2,000 g C m⁻² = 20 t C ha⁻¹ (1 g m⁻² = 0.01 t ha⁻¹). 25 omits fAPAR.
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
In the land sharing versus land sparing debate, land sparing means:
D. High-yield production on part of the land to protect the rest
Sparing separates intensive production from protected areas; sharing integrates both on the same land.
Further reading: Turner M; Forman R; Forman R; MacArthur R
Ten here, 47 in the app. The Laisha app has every practice question we have written to ICAR AICE-JRF/SRF in this subject, marked as you go, with timed papers, a jump-to-unanswered list and a certificate when you pass at 70 per cent.
Free for ten days, then one subscription of US$10 a month. We would rather say so here than have you find it later.
An AI operating system for agriculture: free guides, manuals and tools written for every country.